StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Load Balancer Reverse Proxy
  5. F5 BIG-IP vs GLBC

F5 BIG-IP vs GLBC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

F5 BIG-IP
F5 BIG-IP
Stacks50
Followers64
Votes0
GLBC
GLBC
Stacks49
Followers53
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks316

F5 BIG-IP vs GLBC: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development and server management, understanding the key differences between F5 BIG-IP and GLBC is essential for choosing the right solution for your needs. Here, we will explore six key differences between the two to help you make an informed decision.

  1. Load Balancing Algorithm: F5 BIG-IP uses algorithms like Round Robin, Least Connections, and Fastest Node to distribute traffic, providing flexibility based on requirements. In contrast, GLBC relies solely on the Round Robin algorithm, which may limit optimization in complex network environments.

  2. SSL Offloading: F5 BIG-IP offers native SSL offloading capabilities, allowing SSL processing to be performed at the load balancer rather than at the application servers. On the other hand, GLBC does not natively support SSL offloading, potentially increasing the load on backend servers handling encryption and decryption tasks.

  3. Redundancy and High Availability: F5 BIG-IP is known for its robust redundancy and high availability features, including active-active and active-passive configurations for failover. GLBC, while providing basic redundancy support, may not offer the same level of failover options and configuration flexibility as F5 BIG-IP.

  4. Security Features: F5 BIG-IP includes advanced security features like Web Application Firewall (WAF), DDoS protection, and IP intelligence for enhanced protection against cyber threats. In comparison, GLBC may have more limited security capabilities, potentially requiring additional solutions to achieve a similar security posture.

  5. Scalability: F5 BIG-IP is designed to scale horizontally and vertically, allowing for seamless growth as traffic volume increases. GLBC, while capable of handling moderate traffic loads, may face limitations in scaling to accommodate rapidly expanding web applications or services.

  6. Cost and Licensing: F5 BIG-IP is a premium solution with associated costs for licensing, support, and additional modules or features. GLBC, as an open-source project, offers a cost-effective alternative with no licensing fees, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations with limited resources.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between F5 BIG-IP and GLBC in terms of load balancing algorithms, SSL offloading, redundancy, security features, scalability, and cost can help you make an informed decision based on your specific requirements and priorities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

F5 BIG-IP
F5 BIG-IP
GLBC
GLBC

It ensures that applications are always secure and perform the way they should. You get built-in security, traffic management, and performance application services, whether your applications live in a private data center or in the cloud.

It is a GCE L7 load balancer controller that manages external loadbalancers configured through the Kubernetes Ingress API.

-
Manages external loadbalancers; Configured through the Kubernetes Ingress API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
316
Stacks
50
Stacks
49
Followers
64
Followers
53
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to F5 BIG-IP, GLBC?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Traefik

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

Load Balancers are a highly available, fully-managed service that work right out of the box and can be deployed as fast as a Droplet. Load Balancers distribute incoming traffic across your infrastructure to increase your application's availability.

Google Cloud Load Balancing

Google Cloud Load Balancing

You can scale your applications on Google Compute Engine from zero to full-throttle with it, with no pre-warming needed. You can distribute your load-balanced compute resources in single or multiple regions, close to your users and to meet your high availability requirements.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana