StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Fastify vs LoopBack

Fastify vs LoopBack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LoopBack
LoopBack
Stacks285
Followers556
Votes33
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.2K
Fastify
Fastify
Stacks506
Followers523
Votes95
GitHub Stars34.9K
Forks2.5K

Fastify vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will compare Fastify and LoopBack to understand their key differences.

  1. Fastify: Fastify is a web framework for Node.js that focuses on providing an efficient and low overhead solution for building web applications and APIs. It is known for its speed, as it claims to be one of the fastest Node.js frameworks available.

  2. LoopBack: LoopBack is a highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables developers to quickly build dynamic, scalable, and easily maintainable APIs and applications. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for creating RESTful APIs with minimal coding effort.

  3. Performance: Fastify is designed with a focus on performance and claims to be faster than most popular Node.js frameworks, including Express. It achieves this by using an asynchronous architecture and optimizing the processing pipeline. This makes it a preferred choice for building high-performance web applications.

  4. Extensibility: LoopBack is known for its high degree of extensibility. It provides a modular architecture that allows developers to easily plug in additional functionalities and features as per their requirements. This modular approach makes it suitable for building complex and customizable applications.

  5. API Development: Fastify primarily focuses on building APIs and provides features specifically designed for API development. It offers a simple and intuitive API declaration syntax, support for various serialization formats, and built-in validation capabilities. This makes it an excellent choice for building scalable and maintainable APIs.

  6. Full-Stack Development: LoopBack, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive framework for full-stack application development. It offers features like data modeling, database integration, and client-side rendering, making it suitable for building end-to-end applications. It provides a robust foundation for building enterprise-level applications with ease.

In Summary, Fastify is a high-performance web framework that excels in building APIs, while LoopBack is a highly-extensible framework that provides a comprehensive set of tools for full-stack application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack
LoopBack
Fastify
Fastify

A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
100% asynchronous: all the core is implemented with asynchronous code, in this way not even a millisecond is wasted.;Highly performant: as far as we know, Fastify is one of the fastest web frameworks in town, depending on the code complexity we can serve up to 20000 request per second.;Extendible: Fastify is fully extensible via its hooks, plugins and decorators.;Schema based: even if it is not mandatory we recommend to use JSON Schema to validate your routes and serialize your outputs, internally Fastify compiles the schema in an highly performant function.;Logging: logs are extremely important but are costly; we chose the best logger to almost remove this cost, Pino!;Developer friendly: the framework is built to be very expressive and help the developer in his daily use, without sacrificing performance and security.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
34.9K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
285
Stacks
506
Followers
556
Followers
523
Votes
33
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback
  • 9
    Easy Database Migration
  • 6
    Code generator
  • 4
    The future of API's
  • 2
    GraphQL
Cons
  • 7
    Community is slow
  • 1
    Backward compatibility
Pros
  • 21
    Performance
  • 13
    Easy to use
  • 12
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Middleware
Cons
  • 1
    Small community
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
GraphQL
GraphQL
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Fastify?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase