StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Fastify vs Slim

Fastify vs Slim

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slim
Slim
Stacks273
Followers391
Votes152
GitHub Stars12.2K
Forks2.0K
Fastify
Fastify
Stacks506
Followers523
Votes95
GitHub Stars34.9K
Forks2.5K

Fastify vs Slim: What are the differences?

  1. Routing and Middleware: Fastify provides a more extensive and robust routing system compared to Slim, including support for prefixing, versioning, and handling multiple methods for a route. On the other hand, Slim offers a simpler and more streamlined routing approach with middleware support for adding additional functionality to routes.
  2. Performance: Fastify is known for its exceptional performance due to its low overhead and optimized processing speed, making it a preferred choice for handling high traffic and demanding applications. In contrast, Slim is lightweight and nimble but may not always match the performance levels of Fastify in certain scenarios.
  3. Plugin Ecosystem: Fastify has a well-developed plugin ecosystem with a wide range of plugins available for various functionalities, enabling developers to extend the framework's capabilities easily. Slim, while having a decent collection of plugins, may not have the same breadth and depth of options as Fastify.
  4. Middleware Processing Order: In Fastify, middleware is executed in the order it is registered, allowing for precise control over the processing flow. Slim, however, follows a FIFO (First In, First Out) approach for middleware, which may impact the sequence of operations in more complex scenarios.
  5. Request Validation: Fastify offers built-in request validation capabilities using JSON schema, making it easier to define and enforce data validation rules for incoming requests. Slim, while capable of performing request validation, may require more manual configuration and setup to achieve similar functionality.
  6. Custom Error Handling: Fastify provides robust support for custom error handling, allowing developers to define specific error responses and behaviors based on different scenarios. In comparison, Slim offers error handling mechanisms but may not offer the same level of flexibility and customization as Fastify.

In Summary, Fastify and Slim differ significantly in terms of routing capabilities, performance, plugin ecosystems, middleware processing order, request validation options, and custom error handling features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Slim
Slim
Fastify
Fastify

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

-
100% asynchronous: all the core is implemented with asynchronous code, in this way not even a millisecond is wasted.;Highly performant: as far as we know, Fastify is one of the fastest web frameworks in town, depending on the code complexity we can serve up to 20000 request per second.;Extendible: Fastify is fully extensible via its hooks, plugins and decorators.;Schema based: even if it is not mandatory we recommend to use JSON Schema to validate your routes and serialize your outputs, internally Fastify compiles the schema in an highly performant function.;Logging: logs are extremely important but are costly; we chose the best logger to almost remove this cost, Pino!;Developer friendly: the framework is built to be very expressive and help the developer in his daily use, without sacrificing performance and security.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.2K
GitHub Stars
34.9K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
273
Stacks
506
Followers
391
Followers
523
Votes
152
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Microframework
  • 27
    API
  • 22
    Open source
  • 21
    Php
  • 11
    Fast
Pros
  • 21
    Performance
  • 13
    Easy to use
  • 12
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Middleware
Cons
  • 1
    Small community
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Slim, Fastify?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase