Fat-Free vs Mono

Overview

Fat-Free

Stacks39

Followers51

Votes41

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks443

Mono

Stacks94

Followers59

Votes1

GitHub Stars11.4K

Forks3.8K

Fat-Free vs Mono: What are the differences?

Developers describe Fat-Free as "PHP micro-framework designed to help you build dynamic and robust Web applications - fast". Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs. On the other hand, Mono is detailed as "*Open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework *". It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.

Fat-Free and Mono can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Fat-Free and Mono are both open source tools. Mono with 8.19K GitHub stars and 3.28K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Fat-Free with 2.31K GitHub stars and 444 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Detailed Comparison

Fat-Free	Mono
Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.	It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.
-	Cross platform ;Open source; Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars 11.4K
GitHub Forks 443	GitHub Forks 3.8K
Stacks 39	Stacks 94
Followers 51	Followers 59
Votes 41	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Open source 7 Fast 5 Neat and Clean 5 Design pattern flexibility 4 SQL AND NOSQL ORM	Pros 1 It was great, pre-dotnetcore
Integrations
PHP	Entity Framework Mac OS X C# Windows Debian

What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, Mono?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.