Fat-Free vs Vapor

Overview

Fat-Free

Stacks39

Followers51

Votes41

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks443

Vapor

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes65

Fat-Free vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Developers describe Fat-Free as "PHP micro-framework designed to help you build dynamic and robust Web applications - fast". Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs. On the other hand, Vapor is detailed as "A type-safe web framework for Swift". Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.

Fat-Free and Vapor belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

"Open source" is the top reason why over 5 developers like Fat-Free, while over 4 developers mention "Fast" as the leading cause for choosing Vapor.

Fat-Free and Vapor are both open source tools. It seems that Vapor with 16.8K GitHub stars and 997 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Fat-Free with 2.3K GitHub stars and 443 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Detailed Comparison

Fat-Free	Vapor
Fat-Free Framework makes it easy to build entire Web sites in a jiffy. With the same power and brevity as modern Javascript toolkits and libraries, F3 helps you write better-looking and more reliable PHP programs.	Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.
-	Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 443	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 39	Stacks 117
Followers 51	Followers 217
Votes 41	Votes 65
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Open source 7 Fast 5 Neat and Clean 5 Design pattern flexibility 4 API	Pros 13 Fast 11 Swift 10 Type-safe 6 Great for apis 5 Good Abstraction Cons 1 Not as much support available. 1 Server side swift is still in its infancy
Integrations
PHP	Swift

What are some alternatives to Fat-Free, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.