Flakes vs Material Design for Angular

Overview

Material Design for Angular

Stacks11.8K

Followers9.6K

Votes522

GitHub Stars16.5K

Forks3.4K

Flakes

Stacks8

Followers11

Votes3

GitHub Stars1.8K

Forks82

Flakes vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

Developers describe Flakes as "Front-end framework optimized for internal apps". Flakes is an Admin Template Framework. A combination of CSS Libraries, JavaScript Libraries and Design files that help you build business tools very quickly. On the other hand, Material Design for Angular is detailed as "Material Design for AngularJS Apps". Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Flakes and Material Design for Angular can be primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.

Flakes and Material Design for Angular are both open source tools. It seems that Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.57K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Flakes with 1.87K GitHub stars and 94 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular	Flakes
Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.	Flakes is an Admin Template Framework. A combination of CSS Libraries, JavaScript Libraries and Design files that help you build business tools very quickly.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 16.5K	GitHub Stars 1.8K
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks 82
Stacks 11.8K	Stacks 8
Followers 9.6K	Followers 11
Votes 522	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 122 Ui components 63 Backed by google 51 Backed by angular 51 Free 47 Javascript Cons 4 No practical examples	Pros 1 Minimalist to almost the extreme 1 Good integration with gridforms 1 High information density Cons 1 Seemingly small to no community 1 Not comprehensive
Integrations
AngularJS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Flakes?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Flakes vs Material Design for Angular