Overview

Flask

Stacks19.3K

Followers16.2K

Votes60

LoopBack

Stacks285

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

Flask vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Flask and LoopBack.

1. **Architecture**: Flask is a microframework, providing only the essentials for web development, while LoopBack is a more comprehensive framework with built-in models, data sources, and relationships.
2. **Language Support**: Flask is a Python-based framework, making it easy for Python developers to use, whereas LoopBack is a Node.js-based framework, catering to JavaScript developers.
3. **Scalability**: Flask is more lightweight and suitable for small to medium-sized applications, whereas LoopBack is designed to handle large-scale, enterprise-level applications with ease.
4. **Community Support**: Flask has a strong community backing due to its widespread adoption in the Python community, while LoopBack has a smaller but dedicated community of Node.js developers.
5. **REST API Development**: LoopBack comes with built-in tools and functionalities for quickly developing REST APIs, making it a preferred choice for API-centric applications, while Flask requires more manual configuration for API development.
6. **Documentation**: Flask has extensive and well-documented resources available, making it easy for beginners to get started, whereas LoopBack's documentation is comprehensive but may be overwhelming for newcomers.

In Summary, Flask and LoopBack differ in architecture, language support, scalability, community support, REST API development, and documentation, catering to different developer preferences and project requirements.

🔥 Trending in Microframeworks on StackShare

Hamilton Microframeworks

A scalable general purpose micro-framework for defining dataflows

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on Flask, LoopBack

Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Python

Flask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

391k views391k

Comments

Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k

Comments

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask	LoopBack
Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.	A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.
-	A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 13.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 19.3K	Stacks 285
Followers 16.2K	Followers 556
Votes 60	Votes 33
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 For it flexibility 9 Flexibilty and easy to use 7 User friendly 6 Secured 5 Unopinionated Cons 10 Not JS 7 Context 5 Not fast 1 Don't has many module as in spring	Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility
Integrations
No integrations available	Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS StrongLoop GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Flask, LoopBack?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.