StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Flight vs Semantic UI React

Flight vs Semantic UI React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flight
Flight
Stacks15
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.5K
Forks542
Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React
Stacks227
Followers382
Votes28
GitHub Stars13.3K
Forks4.1K

Flight vs Semantic UI React: What are the differences?

Developers describe Flight as "A component-based, event-driven JavaScript framework from Twitter". Flight is distinct from existing frameworks in that it doesn't prescribe or provide any particular approach to rendering or providing data to a web application. It's agnostic to how requests are routed, which templating language you use or even if you render your HTML on the client or the server. While some web frameworks encourage developers to arrange their code around a prescribed model layer, Flight is organized around the existing DOM model with functionality mapped directly to DOM nodes. On the other hand, Semantic UI React is detailed as "Integrating Semantic-UI and React". Semantic UI React is the official React integration for Semantic UI. jQuery Free, Declarative API, Shorthand Props, and more.

Flight and Semantic UI React can be primarily classified as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.

Flight and Semantic UI React are both open source tools. Semantic UI React with 9.88K GitHub stars and 2.69K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Flight with 6.64K GitHub stars and 588 GitHub forks.

Rev.io, DataGlen, and Brikl Ltd. are some of the popular companies that use Semantic UI React, whereas Flight is used by Adtena, Birchbox, and Drip. Semantic UI React has a broader approval, being mentioned in 16 company stacks & 22 developers stacks; compared to Flight, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flight, Semantic UI React

Amar
Amar

Mar 24, 2021

Review

You can develop your backend on Flask or Django. As it is just a blogging app, you can do with a simple ReST API & SQL Alchemy for storing data. But, if you really have time, I would recommend you to learn the MERN stack completely, i. e. MongoDB, Express, React, Node. Also don't forget to revisit the HTML5 & CSS3 features, CSS Animations & Transitions, etc. A pre-requisite for learning React & Node will be the Javascript language. Make sure you learn the basics, refer https://javascript.info. Only then start with React or Node.

28.6k views28.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flight
Flight
Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React

Flight is distinct from existing frameworks in that it doesn't prescribe or provide any particular approach to rendering or providing data to a web application. It's agnostic to how requests are routed, which templating language you use or even if you render your HTML on the client or the server. While some web frameworks encourage developers to arrange their code around a prescribed model layer, Flight is organized around the existing DOM model with functionality mapped directly to DOM nodes.

Semantic UI React is the official React integration for Semantic UI. jQuery Free, Declarative API, Shorthand Props, and more.

-
No jQuery dependency;No animation dependencies;Reuse SUI CSS transitions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.5K
GitHub Stars
13.3K
GitHub Forks
542
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
15
Stacks
227
Followers
19
Followers
382
Votes
0
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 10
    Great look&feel
  • 6
    Really adaptive -good support of different screen sizes
  • 5
    Great lib, lots of components enough to build a big app
  • 3
    Extensible and lots of components but no transitions
  • 2
    Documentation is also understandable
Cons
  • 3
    Poor Documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
Semantic UI
Semantic UI

What are some alternatives to Flight, Semantic UI React?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase