StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Prototyping
  4. Mobile Prototyping Interaction Design Tools
  5. Flinto vs Principle

Flinto vs Principle

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flinto
Flinto
Stacks39
Followers44
Votes0
Principle
Principle
Stacks78
Followers97
Votes0

Flinto vs Principle: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Flinto and Principle. Flinto and Principle are both prototyping tools used to create interactive and animated designs for websites and mobile applications. However, they have some distinct features that set them apart from each other. Let's dive into the differences.

  1. Animation Capabilities: Flinto offers more advanced animation capabilities compared to Principle. It allows designers to create complex animations, microinteractions, and transitions using its powerful timeline editor and behaviors system. On the other hand, Principle focuses more on simplicity and ease of use, offering basic but intuitive animation features that can be easily created using a timeline and drag-and-drop interface.

  2. Integration with Design Tools: Flinto provides seamless integration with popular design tools like Sketch and Figma, allowing designers to directly import their designs and assets into Flinto for prototyping. Principle also supports integration with Sketch, but it doesn't have native integration with Figma. This can affect the workflow of designers who heavily rely on the Figma design tool.

  3. Prototyping Interactions and Gestures: Flinto offers a wide range of interactions and gestures that can be applied to elements within the prototype. It supports complex gestures like pinch, swipe, rotate, drag, and many more, giving designers more control over the user experience. On the other hand, Principle focuses more on simple touch interactions and gestures, providing basic options like tap, scroll, and swipe.

  4. Collaboration and Team Collaboration: Flinto provides features for collaboration and team collaboration, allowing designers to share and gather feedback on their prototypes with stakeholders and team members. It offers options to comment, annotate, and track changes within the design. However, Principle lacks robust collaboration features, making it more suitable for individual designers or small teams who don't require extensive collaboration.

  5. Preview and Testing Capabilities: Flinto offers a dedicated Flinto iOS app that allows designers to preview and test their prototypes on actual iOS devices. This enables them to get a more accurate feel of how the prototype will behave on real devices. Principle, on the other hand, doesn't have a dedicated app for previewing and testing, although it provides a built-in preview feature within the software.

  6. Pricing Model: Flinto follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a monthly or annual fee to access the software and receive updates. It offers different pricing tiers depending on the needs of the user. Conversely, Principle follows a one-time purchase pricing model, where users pay a fixed price to own the software permanently, including future updates. This difference in pricing models can influence the affordability and accessibility of the tools for different users.

In Summary, Flinto offers more advanced animation capabilities, seamless integration with design tools like Sketch and Figma, extensive interactions and gestures, collaboration features, a dedicated preview app, and a subscription-based pricing model. Principle focuses on simplicity, integration with Sketch, basic touch interactions, lack of robust collaboration features, a built-in preview feature, and a one-time purchase pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flinto
Flinto
Principle
Principle

It is a Mac app used by designers around the world to create interactive and animated prototypes of their app designs. It lets designers quickly make interactive prototypes of their mobile, desktop, or web apps.

It makes it easy to design animated and interactive user interfaces. Whether you're designing the flow of a multi-screen app, or new interactions and animations, it helps you create designs that look and feel amazing.

Statistics
Stacks
39
Stacks
78
Followers
44
Followers
97
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Flinto, Principle?

Framer

Framer

Framer is a JavaScript framework that makes creating realistic prototypes a breeze – complete with filters, spring physics and full 3D effects. Framer Generator is a desktop app that imports the resources and folder hierarchy from Photoshop files (Sketch coming soon). Import your design and immediately start to add interaction and animation.

ProtoPie

ProtoPie

It is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT. ProtoPie runs on macOS & Windows and the player app is on iOS and Android.

Origami

Origami

Origami is a free toolkit for Quartz Composer—created by the Facebook Design team—that makes interactive design prototyping easy and doesn’t require programming.

Supernova

Supernova

Supernova converts any mobile design to full-fledged native applications, giving the developers extra time to do actual coding. No need to export resources, write navigation, connect it to components created by hand, read styles, apply styles, copy-paste information..

Lottie

Lottie

Lottie is a mobile library for Android and iOS that parses Adobe After Effects animations exported as json with Bodymovin and renders them natively on mobile!

Material

Material

Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.

Fuse

Fuse

It is a set of user experience development tools that unify design, prototyping and implementation of high quality, native apps for iOS and Android.

Fiber

Fiber

Fiber UI Kit is the perfect starting place for your next project. Each element has been designed to work independently or as one seamless flow. It’s a full-fledged prototype with customizable components.

Pop

Pop

Pop is an extensible animation engine for iOS and OS X. In addition to basic static animations, it supports spring and decay dynamic animations, making it useful for building realistic, physics-based interactions. The API allows quick integration with existing Objective-C codebases and enables the animation of any property on any object. It's a mature and well-tested framework that drives all the animations and transitions in Paper.

Avocado

Avocado

Avocado is an open source interaction design toolbox built by​ IDEO.​ It ​enables designers to make quick interactive prototypes without writing a line of code.​ ​Built on top of Facebook's Origami framework, Avocado provides ready-to-use patches that can be easily combined to create fully-customized prototypes.​ Official announcement: http://labs.ideo.com/2014/05/27/avocado/

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope