Alternatives to Flood IO logo

Alternatives to Flood IO

BlazeMeter, Apache JMeter, Gatling, Locust, and k6 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Flood IO.
17
55
+ 1
5

What is Flood IO and what are its top alternatives?

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.
Flood IO is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Flood IO

  • BlazeMeter

    BlazeMeter

    Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br> ...

  • Apache JMeter

    Apache JMeter

    It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions. ...

  • Gatling

    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Locust

    Locust

    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. ...

  • k6

    k6

    It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow. ...

  • Loader.io

    Loader.io

    Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections. ...

  • AWS Device Farm

    AWS Device Farm

    Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors. ...

  • RedLine13

    RedLine13

    It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools. ...

Flood IO alternatives & related posts

BlazeMeter logo

BlazeMeter

54
125
12
The Load Testing Platform for Developers
54
125
+ 1
12
PROS OF BLAZEMETER
  • 9
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
CONS OF BLAZEMETER
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric

related BlazeMeter posts

Apache JMeter logo

Apache JMeter

314
206
6
An open source load testing tool
314
206
+ 1
6
PROS OF APACHE JMETER
  • 4
    Requires no programming knowledge
  • 1
    Supports distributed
  • 1
    Open-source
CONS OF APACHE JMETER
  • 1
    It's GUI-first
  • 1
    Too complicated

related Apache JMeter posts

Gatling logo

Gatling

217
259
17
Open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty
217
259
+ 1
17
PROS OF GATLING
  • 5
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 4
    Loadrunner
  • 2
    Scala based
  • 1
    Load test as code
CONS OF GATLING
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed

related Gatling posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Locust logo

Locust

127
227
30
Define user behaviour with Python code, and swarm your system with millions of simultaneous users
127
227
+ 1
30
PROS OF LOCUST
  • 9
    Supports distributed
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Hackable
  • 3
    Easy to setup
  • 2
    Test Anything
  • 1
    Cons
CONS OF LOCUST
  • 1
    Bad design

related Locust posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
k6 logo

k6

86
127
44
Developer centric open-source load and performance testing tool
86
127
+ 1
44
PROS OF K6
  • 10
    Fits nicely in a CI workflow
  • 10
    It's code-first
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Test scripts are written in javascript
  • 7
    Easy to use
CONS OF K6
  • 2
    Requires bundling and transpiling to use npm packages

related k6 posts

Loader.io logo

Loader.io

69
148
17
Simple Cloud-based Load Testing
69
148
+ 1
17
PROS OF LOADER.IO
  • 8
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Free tier
  • 3
    Heroku add-on
CONS OF LOADER.IO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Loader.io posts

    AWS Device Farm logo

    AWS Device Farm

    68
    151
    5
    Test your app on real devices in the AWS Cloud
    68
    151
    + 1
    5
    PROS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
    • 3
      1000 free minutes
    • 2
      Pay as you go pricing
    CONS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
    • 1
      Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done
    • 1
      You need to remember to turn airplane mode off

    related AWS Device Farm posts

    RedLine13 logo

    RedLine13

    12
    16
    8
    (Almost) free load and performance testing in the cloud
    12
    16
    + 1
    8
    PROS OF REDLINE13
    • 4
      Easy to scale JMeter in the cloud cheaply
    • 2
      Easy to scale JMeter in the cloud for free or almost fr
    • 1
      Can run load agents in any EC2 Region
    • 1
      Generate JMeter Report in the cloud
    CONS OF REDLINE13
      Be the first to leave a con

      related RedLine13 posts