Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Flux

Stacks526

Followers513

Votes130

Flux vs React: What are the differences?

# Introduction

When comparing Flux and React, it's crucial to understand their distinct characteristics and functionalities to make informed decisions when developing web applications.

1. **Data Flow**: One fundamental difference between Flux and React is their approach to data flow. Flux emphasizes unidirectional data flow, ensuring that data changes are predictable and maintainable. React, on the other hand, focuses on building reusable UI components that are driven by changes in data.

2. **State Management**: Flux involves separate stores to manage application state, ensuring a clear separation of concerns. React, instead, uses local component state and props to manage data and handle interactions within the application.

3. **Architecture**: Flux architecture includes multiple components such as Action Creators, Dispatcher, Stores, and Views, which work together to maintain a unidirectional data flow. React, however, primarily focuses on building UI components and utilizing a virtual DOM for efficient rendering.

4. **Community Support**: React has a larger and more active community compared to Flux, providing a vast array of resources, libraries, and tools for developers. Flux, while still relevant, has seen a decline in popularity as React's ecosystem continues to evolve.

5. **Testing**: Flux applications are typically easier to test due to their clear data flow and separation of concerns. React components can be tested efficiently using libraries such as Jest, enabling developers to write comprehensive test suites for their applications.

6. **Learning Curve**: Flux can have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its specific architecture and concepts. React, with its focus on building UI components, may be more accessible to developers starting their journey in web development.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Flux and React, ranging from data flow and state management to architecture and community support, is essential for making informed decisions when building web applications.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

React UI Components

A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

399

147k

Advice on React, Flux

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Flux
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 526
Followers 147.0K	Followers 513
Votes 4.1K	Votes 130
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	Pros 44 Unidirectional data flow 32 Architecture 19 Structure and Data Flow 14 Not MVC 12 Open source

What are some alternatives to React, Flux?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Preact

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).