Fork vs GitKraken

Overview

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

Fork

Stacks197

Followers258

Votes126

Fork vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a markup language that is commonly used to format text on websites. In this document, I will provide the key differences between Fork and GitKraken and format the content as Markdown code.

1. Feature Set: Fork provides a comprehensive feature set that includes a visual commit history, branch management, merge conflict resolution, and a built-in text editor. On the other hand, GitKraken offers similar features but also includes functionalities like git blame, stash management, and interactive rebasing.

2. User Interface: The user interface of Fork is straightforward and simple, making it easy for beginners to use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and intuitive interface, with various customization options and a smoother user experience.

3. Integration with GitHub: Fork has seamless integration with GitHub, allowing users to easily clone and manage repositories, create pull requests, and view and create issues. While GitKraken also integrates with GitHub, it offers additional features like code reviews and the ability to sign commits using the GPG key.

4. Pricing: Fork is primarily free to use, with a Pro version available that includes advanced features like dark mode, multiple profiles, and professional support. GitKraken offers a free version with limited features and a paid Pro version that includes additional functionality like GitFlow integration and file history.

5. Collaboration: Fork allows users to collaborate on projects by cloning repositories, creating branches, and merging changes. GitKraken offers similar collaboration features but also provides a built-in chat system, which allows team members to communicate and discuss code changes directly within the app.

6. Platform Compatibility: Fork is available for Windows and macOS operating systems, while GitKraken also supports Linux. This makes GitKraken a better choice for developers working on Linux-based systems.

In summary, Fork and GitKraken are both powerful Git clients with unique features and capabilities. Fork is more user-friendly and provides seamless integration with GitHub, while GitKraken offers a more visually appealing interface and additional collaboration features. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitKraken, Fork

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitKraken	Fork
The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.	Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.
Statistics
Stacks 725	Stacks 197
Followers 909	Followers 258
Votes 290	Votes 126
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Gitflow support 21 Full featured client Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 3 Not as many features as sourcetree 3 Do not allow to directly edit staging area	Pros 19 One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs 14 Nice UX 13 Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast 13 Does the job way better than others 11 Dark theme Cons 2 Poorly written license 1 Merges that require interactive user decision 1 Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history
Integrations
Git	Git

What are some alternatives to GitKraken, Fork?

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

SmartGit

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Related Comparisons

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

Fork

Stacks197

Followers258

Votes126

Fork vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Feature Set: Fork provides a comprehensive feature set that includes a visual commit history, branch management, merge conflict resolution, and a built-in text editor. On the other hand, GitKraken offers similar features but also includes functionalities like git blame, stash management, and interactive rebasing.

2. User Interface: The user interface of Fork is straightforward and simple, making it easy for beginners to use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and intuitive interface, with various customization options and a smoother user experience.

3. Integration with GitHub: Fork has seamless integration with GitHub, allowing users to easily clone and manage repositories, create pull requests, and view and create issues. While GitKraken also integrates with GitHub, it offers additional features like code reviews and the ability to sign commits using the GPG key.

4. Pricing: Fork is primarily free to use, with a Pro version available that includes advanced features like dark mode, multiple profiles, and professional support. GitKraken offers a free version with limited features and a paid Pro version that includes additional functionality like GitFlow integration and file history.

5. Collaboration: Fork allows users to collaborate on projects by cloning repositories, creating branches, and merging changes. GitKraken offers similar collaboration features but also provides a built-in chat system, which allows team members to communicate and discuss code changes directly within the app.

6. Platform Compatibility: Fork is available for Windows and macOS operating systems, while GitKraken also supports Linux. This makes GitKraken a better choice for developers working on Linux-based systems.

Advice on GitKraken, Fork

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitKraken	Fork
The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.	Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.
Statistics
Stacks 725	Stacks 197
Followers 909	Followers 258
Votes 290	Votes 126
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Gitflow support 21 Full featured client Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 3 Not as many features as sourcetree 3 Do not allow to directly edit staging area	Pros 19 One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs 14 Nice UX 13 Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast 13 Does the job way better than others 11 Dark theme Cons 2 Poorly written license 1 Merges that require interactive user decision 1 Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history
Integrations
Git	Git

Fork vs GitKraken

Overview

Fork vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction

2. User Interface: The user interface of Fork is straightforward and simple, making it easy for beginners to use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and intuitive interface, with various customization options and a smoother user experience.