StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Source Code Management Desktop Apps
  5. Fork vs SmartGit

Fork vs SmartGit

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SmartGit
SmartGit
Stacks40
Followers49
Votes2
Fork
Fork
Stacks197
Followers258
Votes126

Fork vs SmartGit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this markdown code, I will provide the key differences between Fork and SmartGit, two popular version control systems.

1. Fork vs SmartGit: Integration with GitHub

Fork integrates seamlessly with GitHub, providing a convenient way to clone, commit, and push changes to a GitHub repository. SmartGit, on the other hand, also supports GitHub integration but offers additional features like managing pull requests and browsing and checking out remote branches.

2. Fork vs SmartGit: User Interface

Fork has a simple and intuitive user interface, making it easy for beginners to understand and use. SmartGit, however, has a more complex and advanced user interface, which may be more suitable for experienced users who require more control and customization options.

3. Fork vs SmartGit: Branching and Merging

Fork offers a streamlined and straightforward approach to branching and merging, allowing users to create and manage branches with ease. SmartGit, on the other hand, provides more advanced options for branching and merging, including support for complex merge scenarios and visual representation of merge conflicts.

4. Fork vs SmartGit: Stashing Changes

Fork allows users to stash their changes temporarily, which can be helpful when switching between different tasks or branches. SmartGit, on the other hand, provides more advanced stashing options, including the ability to stash and apply changes selectively and manage multiple stashes simultaneously.

5. Fork vs SmartGit: Gitflow Workflow Support

Fork provides built-in support for the Gitflow workflow, a branching model for larger projects that involves the creation of feature branches, release branches, and hotfix branches. SmartGit also supports the Gitflow workflow but offers additional features like branch graph visualizations and automated branch management.

6. Fork vs SmartGit: Price and Licensing

Fork is a commercial product and requires a paid license for full functionality. SmartGit, on the other hand, offers both free and paid versions, providing a more flexible option for users with different needs and budgets.

In Summary, Fork and SmartGit differ in their integration with GitHub, user interface, branching and merging capabilities, stashing changes options, Gitflow workflow support, as well as pricing and licensing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SmartGit, Fork

Stefan
Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

  • to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
  • it helps to investigate the history
  • most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SmartGit
SmartGit
Fork
Fork

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Statistics
Stacks
40
Stacks
197
Followers
49
Followers
258
Votes
2
Votes
126
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Dark theme
Cons
  • 1
    Non-intuitive actions
  • 1
    Bugs
Pros
  • 19
    One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs
  • 14
    Nice UX
  • 13
    Does the job way better than others
  • 13
    Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast
  • 11
    Dark theme
Cons
  • 2
    Poorly written license
  • 1
    Merges that require interactive user decision
  • 1
    Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to SmartGit, Fork?

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana