StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Clarity Design System vs Foundation

Clarity Design System vs Foundation

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Foundation
Foundation
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes740
Clarity Design System
Clarity Design System
Stacks26
Followers95
Votes25

Clarity Design System vs Foundation: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Clarity Design System and Foundation are two popular front-end design frameworks used for developing user interfaces. While they both aim to provide a consistent and visually appealing design system for websites and applications, there are several key differences that set them apart.

1. Grid System: Clarity Design System uses a flex-based grid system while Foundation utilizes a float-based grid system. The flex-based grid in Clarity allows for more flexibility and control over layout designs, making it easier to build responsive and dynamic interfaces compared to the float-based grid in Foundation.

2. Component Libraries: Clarity Design System offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components like buttons, modals, and inputs that follow Google's Material Design guidelines. On the other hand, Foundation provides a wide range of components and templates for building websites but doesn't strictly adhere to a specific design language like Material Design.

3. Customization Options: Clarity Design System provides a more opinionated approach to design, with a focus on consistency and adherence to design principles. In contrast, Foundation offers more customization options and flexibility, allowing developers to tailor the design system to better suit their specific project requirements.

4. Documentation and Support: Clarity Design System is backed by VMware, which provides thorough documentation, tutorials, and support for developers using the framework. Foundation, on the other hand, has a large community and extensive documentation but may not offer the same level of official support as Clarity.

5. Theme and Styling: Clarity Design System comes with a default theme and styling that aligns with Material Design principles, providing a familiar and visually appealing user interface out of the box. Foundation, on the other hand, allows for more creative freedom in terms of theming and styling, giving developers the ability to create unique and customized designs.

6. Integration with Angular and React: Clarity Design System has official integrations with Angular and React, providing developers with pre-built components and tools to streamline the development process while maintaining consistency across different platforms. In comparison, Foundation also offers integrations with frameworks like Angular and React, but may not have the same level of seamless integration and alignment with design principles as Clarity.

In Summary, Clarity Design System and Foundation differ in terms of their grid systems, component libraries, customization options, documentation and support, theme and styling, and integration with frameworks like Angular and React.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Foundation
Foundation
Clarity Design System
Clarity Design System

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

UX guidelines, HTML/CSS framework, and Angular components working together to craft exceptional experiences. Start building with our HTML/CSS framework and rapidly go from prototype to production.

Semantic: Everything is semantic. You can have the cleanest markup without sacrificing the utility and speed of Foundation.;Mobile First: You can build for small devices first. Then, as devices get larger and larger, layer in more complexity for a complete responsive design.;Customizable: You can customize your build to include or remove certain elements, as well as define the size of columns, colors, font size and more.;Professional: Millions of designers and developers depend on Foundation. Now we have business support, training and consulting to help grow your product or service.
Product-based;Rapid development;Reliable;Rapidly go from prototype to production; A set of data-bound and performant components on top of Angular to add interactivity
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
26
Followers
1.2K
Followers
95
Votes
740
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 160
    Responsive grid
  • 93
    Mobile first
  • 80
    Open source
  • 75
    Semantic
  • 72
    Customizable
Cons
  • 5
    Requires jQuery
  • 4
    Awful site
Pros
  • 4
    Angular
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    CSS framework
  • 2
    Sketch Template
Integrations
No integrations available
Angular CLI
Angular CLI
Angular
Angular
AngularJS
AngularJS
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Foundation, Clarity Design System?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase