FullStack Boilerplate vs NestJS: What are the differences?
Developers describe FullStack Boilerplate as "React Native Web with TypeScript, Node.js & GraphQL". The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo. On the other hand, NestJS is detailed as "A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient and scalable server-side applications by @kammysliwiec". Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming)
Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available..
FullStack Boilerplate and NestJS can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
FullStack Boilerplate and NestJS are both open source tools. NestJS with 17.5K GitHub stars and 1.22K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than FullStack Boilerplate with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.83K GitHub forks.