StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. FullStack Boilerplate vs ServiceStack

FullStack Boilerplate vs ServiceStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ServiceStack
ServiceStack
Stacks191
Followers49
Votes0
FullStack Boilerplate
FullStack Boilerplate
Stacks7
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

FullStack Boilerplate vs ServiceStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will compare the key differences between FullStack Boilerplate and ServiceStack. Each difference will be described in a single paragraph, and the formatting will be in Markdown code that can be used on a website.

  1. Frontend and Backend Integration: FullStack Boilerplate provides a pre-built integration between the frontend and backend, making it easier to develop web applications. ServiceStack, on the other hand, is a backend framework that focuses on providing backend services and does not offer an integrated frontend solution.

  2. Technology Stack: FullStack Boilerplate utilizes a technology stack that includes frameworks like React, Express, and MongoDB for building both frontend and backend components of web applications. ServiceStack, on the other hand, uses a different technology stack that includes .NET and C# for building the backend components of web applications.

  3. Development Speed: FullStack Boilerplate is designed to provide a rapid development experience by providing pre-built components and a set of tools that make it easier to develop web applications. ServiceStack, on the other hand, offers a more traditional development approach where developers have more control over the application structure and design.

  4. Community Support: FullStack Boilerplate has a large and active community that provides support, documentation, and a wide range of pre-built components and plugins. ServiceStack also has a community, but it is generally smaller compared to FullStack Boilerplate, and the availability of pre-built components and plugins may be more limited.

  5. Learning Curve: FullStack Boilerplate aims to simplify the web development process by providing a set of pre-built components and tools that abstract away some of the complexity of building web applications. This can help reduce the learning curve for developers who are new to web development. ServiceStack, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve as it requires a solid understanding of .NET and C#.

  6. Scalability and Performance: FullStack Boilerplate is designed to be scalable and performant, with optimizations built-in for handling large amounts of data and high volumes of traffic. ServiceStack also offers scalability and performance features, but the overall architecture and design may differ, as it is primarily focused on providing backend services.

In summary, FullStack Boilerplate offers an integrated frontend and backend solution, a specific technology stack, a rapid development experience, a large community, a reduced learning curve, and scalability and performance optimizations. ServiceStack, on the other hand, focuses on backend services using a different technology stack, provides a more traditional development approach, has a smaller community, has a steeper learning curve, and also offers scalability and performance features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ServiceStack
ServiceStack
FullStack Boilerplate
FullStack Boilerplate

It is a configuration free, code-first, light-weight framework built on top of ASP.NET for building services and web applications. As the name suggests, it is a stack of services. It provides with just everything that one needs for building end-to-end web services.

The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
191
Stacks
7
Followers
49
Followers
30
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
MongoDB
MongoDB
TypeScript
TypeScript
Apollo
Apollo
React Native
React Native
GraphQL
GraphQL
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to ServiceStack, FullStack Boilerplate?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase