Overview

Spring MVC

Stacks479

Followers518

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

FullStack Boilerplate

Stacks7

Followers30

Votes0

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

FullStack Boilerplate vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Key Differences between FullStack Boilerplate and Spring MVC

Integration The FullStack Boilerplate allows for seamless integration of front-end and back-end technologies, providing a comprehensive solution for building full-stack applications. On the other hand, Spring MVC is a Java framework specifically designed for developing web applications, focusing on the server-side implementation.
Language Support The FullStack Boilerplate supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, HTML, CSS, and various front-end frameworks. In contrast, Spring MVC primarily uses Java as its programming language, leveraging the extensive Java ecosystem and libraries.
Architecture The FullStack Boilerplate follows a modular and component-based architecture, enabling developers to create flexible and scalable applications. Spring MVC, on the other hand, adopts a traditional Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, separating the different layers of the application for better organization and maintenance.
Ease of Use The FullStack Boilerplate simplifies the development process by providing a set of pre-configured templates, tools, and libraries, reducing the time and effort required to set up a project. Spring MVC, although powerful, requires more configuration and setup to start a new project, making it slightly more complex for beginners.
Community and Support The FullStack Boilerplate benefits from a large and active community, with numerous resources, tutorials, and plugins available online. Spring MVC also has a robust community, particularly within the Java ecosystem, providing extensive documentation and support for developers.
Flexibility and Extensibility The FullStack Boilerplate offers flexibility in choosing different front-end and back-end technologies, enabling developers to customize and optimize their application stack according to their specific requirements. Spring MVC, being a Java framework, integrates seamlessly with other Java libraries and frameworks, enhancing its extensibility and compatibility within the Java ecosystem.

In summary, the FullStack Boilerplate provides a comprehensive solution for building full-stack applications, supporting multiple programming languages, adopting a modular architecture, and offering ease of use and flexibility. Spring MVC, on the other hand, is a Java-based framework specifically designed for web application development, following a traditional MVC architecture and leveraging the extensive Java ecosystem.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Spring MVC	FullStack Boilerplate
A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.	The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.
Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 479	Stacks 7
Followers 518	Followers 30
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
AngularJS Bootstrap Spring Boot Hibernate	TypeScript Apollo React Native GraphQL Node.js MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Spring MVC, FullStack Boilerplate?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.