Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Fusion.js

Stacks2

Followers18

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.6K

Forks137

Fusion.js vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

Fusion.js and React are both popular frameworks used for building user interfaces in JavaScript. While they both serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two. In this Markdown code, I will showcase these differences and provide a concise summary.

Server-side rendering (SSR): Fusion.js is built specifically for server-side rendering, providing an out-of-the-box solution for creating isomorphic JavaScript applications. React, on the other hand, is primarily a client-side library, requiring additional setup and configuration for server-side rendering.
Plugin-based architecture: Fusion.js follows a plugin-based architecture, allowing developers to easily extend the functionality of their applications by installing and configuring plugins. This modular approach promotes code reusability and simplifies complex application development. React, on the other hand, does not have a built-in plugin system and encourages a more component-driven approach.
Runtime performance optimization: Fusion.js includes several performance optimizations out-of-the-box, such as code-splitting, lazy-loading, and prefetching resources, to enhance the runtime performance of applications. Although React also supports these optimizations, Fusion.js provides a more streamlined performance-focused approach.
Built-in testing utilities: Fusion.js is equipped with built-in testing utilities that facilitate the testing process, including end-to-end testing, integration testing, and unit testing. React, while having a large testing ecosystem, does not provide comparable built-in testing utilities.
Developer tooling and debugging: Fusion.js offers a comprehensive set of developer tooling and debugging capabilities, including a built-in Chrome DevTools extension and performance monitoring that aids in identifying and resolving issues quickly. React, although having widespread developer tooling support, does not provide an official integrated development environment (IDE) or a dedicated debugging extension.
Community and ecosystem: React boasts a massive and vibrant community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and open-source libraries. Fusion.js, while having a growing community, is relatively smaller compared to React's ecosystem, resulting in fewer available resources and fewer third-party libraries and integrations.

In summary, Fusion.js and React differ in their focus and approach. Fusion.js is specifically designed for server-side rendering, offers a plugin-based architecture, focuses on runtime performance optimization and includes built-in testing utilities and developer tooling. React, on the other hand, is primarily a client-side library, promotes a component-driven approach, has a vast community, and supports a wide range of third-party libraries and integrations.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

React UI Components

A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

399

147k

Advice on React, Fusion.js

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Fusion.js
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	It is a modular javascript framework for creating plugin-based React applications. It gives you the developer experience you expect from a React/Redux setup and provides tools to take project quality to the next level.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	Plugin-based architecture and DI system for maintainability; Out-of-the-box support for server-rendering of React components, bundle splitting and hot module reloading
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars 1.6K
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks 137
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 2
Followers 147.0K	Followers 18
Votes 4.1K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to React, Fusion.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.