StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Gatsby Cloud vs Pelican

Gatsby Cloud vs Pelican

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pelican
Pelican
Stacks89
Followers113
Votes28
GitHub Stars13.1K
Forks1.8K
Gatsby Cloud
Gatsby Cloud
Stacks76
Followers97
Votes1

Gatsby Cloud vs Pelican: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Gatsby Cloud and Pelican:

1. **Static Site Generation**: Gatsby Cloud is a modern static site generator that uses React to build websites, while Pelican is a Python-based static site generator. Gatsby Cloud offers advanced features such as server-side rendering and incremental builds, making it a popular choice for building performant websites.
  
2. **Framework Ecosystem**: Gatsby Cloud has a large ecosystem of plugins and themes that can be easily integrated into a project, providing developers with a wide range of customization options. On the other hand, Pelican has a smaller ecosystem but offers flexibility in terms of creating custom themes and plugins using Python.
  
3. **Hosting and Deployment**: Gatsby Cloud provides seamless hosting and deployment options through their own platform, making it easy to publish and manage websites. Pelican, on the other hand, requires manual setup and configuration of hosting services, which can be more time-consuming for beginners.
  
4. **Content Management**: Gatsby Cloud has integrations with popular content management systems like WordPress, Drupal, and Shopify, allowing users to easily source content from these platforms. Pelican, on the other hand, relies on markdown files for content management, which can be a more straightforward approach for some users.
  
5. **Performance Optimization**: Gatsby Cloud is optimized for performance, offering features like image optimization, lazy loading, and code splitting out of the box. Pelican, while efficient, may require manual optimization techniques to achieve similar performance results.
  
6. **Community Support**: Gatsby Cloud has a strong and active community that regularly contributes to the project, provides assistance, and shares resources. Pelican, although it has a dedicated user base, may have less frequent updates and community support compared to Gatsby Cloud.

In Summary, Gatsby Cloud and Pelican differ in terms of static site generation, framework ecosystem, hosting and deployment options, content management, performance optimization, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pelican
Pelican
Gatsby Cloud
Gatsby Cloud

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

It is the perfect cloud complement for Gatsby and provide a lot of cloud services Gatsby users need like real-time preview and very fast builds.

Blog articles and pages;Comments, via an external service (Disqus). (Please note that while useful, Disqus is an external service, and thus the comment data will be somewhat outside of your control and potentially subject to data loss.);Theming support (themes are created using Jinja2 templates);PDF generation of the articles/pages (optional);Publication of articles in multiple languages;Atom/RSS feeds;Code syntax highlighting;Import from WordPress, Dotclear, or RSS feeds;Integration with external tools: Twitter, Google Analytics, etc. (optional);Fast rebuild times thanks to content caching and selective output writing.
Real-time Preview: View live content updates from your headless CMS; Blazing fast Gatsby builds in the cloud (in beta); Performance reports; Free tier for small sites
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
89
Stacks
76
Followers
113
Followers
97
Votes
28
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Jinja2
  • 4
    Implemented in Python
  • 4
    Easy to deploy
  • 3
    Plugability
Pros
  • 1
    Able to have multiple sites for multiple clients.
Integrations
Markdown
Markdown
Contentful
Contentful
Drupal
Drupal
GitHub
GitHub
Cosmic JS
Cosmic JS
DatoCMS
DatoCMS
Sanity
Sanity

What are some alternatives to Pelican, Gatsby Cloud?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope