StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Gin Gonic vs Grails

Gin Gonic vs Grails

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grails
Grails
Stacks384
Followers373
Votes333
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Stacks393
Followers340
Votes16
GitHub Stars86.8K
Forks8.5K

Gin Gonic vs Grails: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Gin Gonic and Grails.

  1. Language Compatibility: Gin Gonic is written in Go language, specifically designed for speed and efficiency in web development, while Grails is built on Java and Groovy languages, offering a robust and versatile platform for enterprise application development.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Gin Gonic is known for its high performance and scalability, optimized for handling a large number of requests efficiently, making it suitable for building high-performance APIs. On the other hand, Grails provides a comprehensive framework with built-in features for rapid development but may not perform as well as Gin Gonic in high traffic scenarios.

  3. Framework Architecture: Gin Gonic follows a minimalist approach with a lightweight framework designed for simple and efficient routing, middleware, and request handling, promoting simplicity and speed. In contrast, Grails follows the convention-over-configuration principle, providing a robust and feature-rich framework with a steep learning curve but offering extensive capabilities for complex web applications.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Gin Gonic has a growing community of Go developers and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools that continuously enhance its capabilities and performance. On the other hand, Grails benefits from the extensive Java community support and a wide range of libraries and plugins available for building enterprise-grade applications.

  5. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Gin Gonic is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with clear documentation and straightforward APIs that facilitate quick development and deployment of web services. In comparison, Grails, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and configuration options, requiring more time and effort to master.

  6. Use Cases and Target Audience: Gin Gonic is ideal for developers looking to build fast, lightweight APIs and microservices with minimal overhead and maximum performance. Grails, on the other hand, caters to larger enterprise projects that require a full-stack framework with a wide range of features and capabilities for building complex web applications.

In Summary, Gin Gonic and Grails differ in language compatibility, scalability, framework architecture, community support, learning curve, and target audience, catering to different development needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grails
Grails
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic

Grails is a framework used to build web applications with the Groovy programming language. The core framework is very extensible and there are numerous plugins available that provide easy integration of add-on features.

It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.

FLAT LEARNING CURVE; ON TOP OF SPRING BOOT; SMOOTH JAVA INTEGRATION; REST APIS, REACT, ANGULAR
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
86.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.5K
Stacks
384
Stacks
393
Followers
373
Followers
340
Votes
333
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 56
    Groovy
  • 40
    Jvm
  • 38
    Rapid development
  • 37
    Gorm
  • 30
    Web framework
Cons
  • 3
    Frequent breaking changes
  • 2
    Undocumented features
Pros
  • 11
    Hight performance
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Low performance
  • 1
    No wildcard routing
Integrations
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse
Java
Java
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
React
React
TextMate
TextMate
AngularJS
AngularJS
Groovy
Groovy
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Grails, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase