StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. Git Reflow vs Magit

Git Reflow vs Magit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git Reflow
Git Reflow
Stacks4
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks64
Magit
Magit
Stacks18
Followers12
Votes2
GitHub Stars6.9K
Forks840

Git Reflow vs Magit: What are the differences?

Developers describe Git Reflow as "Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master". Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template. On the other hand, Magit is detailed as "It's Magit! A Git Porcelain inside Emacs". Magit is an interface to the version control system Git, implemented as an Emacs package. Magit aspires to be a complete Git porcelain. While we cannot (yet) claim that Magit wraps and improves upon each and every Git command, it is complete enough to allow even experienced Git users to perform almost all of their daily version control tasks directly from within Emacs. While many fine Git clients exist, only Magit and Git itself deserve to be called porcelains.

Git Reflow and Magit belong to "Version Control System" category of the tech stack.

Git Reflow and Magit are both open source tools. It seems that Magit with 4.09K GitHub stars and 599 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Git Reflow with 1.45K GitHub stars and 60 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git Reflow
Git Reflow
Magit
Magit

Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template.

It is an interface to the version control system Git, implemented as an Emacs package. It aspires to be a complete Git porcelain. While we cannot (yet) claim that it wraps and improves upon each and every Git command, it is complete enough to allow even experienced Git users to perform almost all of their daily version control tasks directly from within Emacs. While many fine Git clients exist, only deserve to be called porcelains.

-
Well-done interface; Easy to get started
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
6.9K
GitHub Forks
64
GitHub Forks
840
Stacks
4
Stacks
18
Followers
11
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Best parts of GUI and command line git clients combined
  • 1
    Word wise diff highlighting
Cons
  • 1
    Can be slow on big diffs
Integrations
Git
Git
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
GitBucket
GitBucket

What are some alternatives to Git Reflow, Magit?

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

DVC

DVC

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

SenseOps (Qlik Sense Writeback & Version Control)

SenseOps (Qlik Sense Writeback & Version Control)

Streamline Qlik Sense with no-code DevOps, CI/CD, and powerful extensions. Build, deploy, and manage analytics faster with SenseOps.

Replicate

Replicate

It lets you run machine learning models with a few lines of code, without needing to understand how machine learning works.

isomorphic-git

isomorphic-git

It is a pure JavaScript reimplementation of git that works in both Node.js and browser JavaScript environments. It can read and write to git repositories, fetch from and push to git remotes (such as GitHub), all without any native C++ module dependencies.

Gitless

Gitless

Gitless is an experiment to see what happens if you put a simple veneer on an app that changes the underlying concepts. Because Gitless is implemented on top of Git (could be considered what Git pros call a "porcelain" of Git), you can always fall back on Git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana