Alternatives to Git logo

Alternatives to Git

GitHub, SVN (Subversion), Bitbucket, Perforce, and Mercurial are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Git.
297.5K
178.7K
+ 1
6.6K

What is Git and what are its top alternatives?

Git is a widely used distributed version control system that allows multiple developers to collaborate on projects efficiently. Its key features include branching and merging, speed, scalability, and data integrity. However, Git has a learning curve for beginners and can be complex to use for some users.

  1. Mercurial: Mercurial is a distributed version control system that offers similar features to Git. Key features include distributed development, easy branching and merging, and performance. Pros: easier learning curve than Git, strong support for Windows. Cons: smaller community compared to Git.
  2. SVN (Apache Subversion): SVN is a centralized version control system that is known for its simplicity and ease of use. Key features include atomic commits, branching and tagging. Pros: simple to use, strong support for binary files. Cons: lacks some advanced features of Git, slower performance for large repositories.
  3. Perforce: Perforce is a centralized version control system commonly used in enterprise settings. Key features include support for large files and repositories, fine-grained access control, and integration with CI/CD tools. Pros: strong support for large projects, enterprise-grade security. Cons: expensive for smaller teams, complex setup and administration.
  4. Fossil: Fossil is a distributed version control system that includes bug tracking and wiki features. Key features include built-in web interface, self-contained executable, and easy setup. Pros: all-in-one solution for version control and project management, simple setup. Cons: limited scalability for very large projects, smaller user base compared to Git.
  5. Bazaar: Bazaar is a distributed version control system developed by Canonical. Key features include focus on ease of use, multiple workflows supported, and extensible with plugins. Pros: easy to learn, flexible workflows, powerful branching and merging. Cons: slower performance compared to Git, smaller community support.
  6. Plastic SCM: Plastic SCM is a distributed version control system designed for tracking changes in large and complex projects. Key features include branching visualization, merge tracking, and scalability. Pros: strong support for large projects, robust branching and merging capabilities. Cons: complex setup, expensive for enterprise use.
  7. SourceGear Vault: SourceGear Vault is a centralized version control system known for its reliability and ease of use. Key features include atomic commits, visual differencing tools, and user-friendly interface. Pros: simple to use, reliable performance. Cons: limited feature set compared to Git, lacks strong support for distributed workflows.
  8. Bitbucket: Bitbucket is a web-based version control system that supports both Git and Mercurial repositories. Key features include code collaboration, pull requests, and continuous integration. Pros: integration with other Atlassian products, free for small teams. Cons: limited support for large projects, slower performance compared to self-hosted Git.
  9. AWS CodeCommit: AWS CodeCommit is a managed version control service that supports Git repositories. Key features include scalability, high availability, and integration with AWS services. Pros: fully managed service, integrates with AWS ecosystem. Cons: limited features compared to Git, higher cost for large repositories.
  10. Darcs: Darcs is a distributed version control system known for its advanced features like patch theory and interactive patch management. Key features include offline commits, cherry-picking changes, and conflict resolution tools. Pros: innovative approach to version control, strong support for non-linear workflows. Cons: slower performance for large repositories, smaller user base than Git.

Top Alternatives to Git

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

  • SVN (Subversion)
    SVN (Subversion)

    Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations. ...

  • Bitbucket
    Bitbucket

    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users. ...

  • Perforce
    Perforce

    Visibility, access control, workflow and code management for Git environments. Flexibility of collaborating on the same codebase and code reviews using any combination of Perforce and Git workflows and tools without compromise. ...

  • Mercurial
    Mercurial

    Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds. ...

  • GitLab
    GitLab

    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers. ...

  • C lang
  • Git Flow
    Git Flow

    It provides excellent command line help and output. It is a merge based solution. It doesn't rebase feature branches. ...

Git alternatives & related posts

GitHub logo

GitHub

285.9K
10.3K
Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
285.9K
10.3K
PROS OF GITHUB
  • 1.8K
    Open source friendly
  • 1.5K
    Easy source control
  • 1.3K
    Nice UI
  • 1.1K
    Great for team collaboration
  • 867
    Easy setup
  • 504
    Issue tracker
  • 487
    Great community
  • 483
    Remote team collaboration
  • 449
    Great way to share
  • 442
    Pull request and features planning
  • 147
    Just works
  • 132
    Integrated in many tools
  • 122
    Free Public Repos
  • 116
    Github Gists
  • 113
    Github pages
  • 83
    Easy to find repos
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Easy to find projects
  • 60
    It's free
  • 56
    Network effect
  • 49
    Extensive API
  • 43
    Organizations
  • 42
    Branching
  • 34
    Developer Profiles
  • 32
    Git Powered Wikis
  • 30
    Great for collaboration
  • 24
    It's fun
  • 23
    Clean interface and good integrations
  • 22
    Community SDK involvement
  • 20
    Learn from others source code
  • 16
    Because: Git
  • 14
    It integrates directly with Azure
  • 10
    Standard in Open Source collab
  • 10
    Newsfeed
  • 8
    Fast
  • 8
    Beautiful user experience
  • 8
    It integrates directly with Hipchat
  • 7
    Easy to discover new code libraries
  • 6
    Smooth integration
  • 6
    Integrations
  • 6
    Graphs
  • 6
    Nice API
  • 6
    It's awesome
  • 6
    Cloud SCM
  • 5
    Quick Onboarding
  • 5
    Remarkable uptime
  • 5
    CI Integration
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    Hands down best online Git service available
  • 4
    Version Control
  • 4
    Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
  • 4
    Simple but powerful
  • 4
    Loved by developers
  • 4
    Free HTML hosting
  • 4
    Uses GIT
  • 4
    Security options
  • 4
    Easy to use and collaborate with others
  • 3
    Easy deployment via SSH
  • 3
    Ci
  • 3
    IAM
  • 3
    Nice to use
  • 2
    Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Self Hosted
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
    Easy source control and everything is backed up
  • 2
    Never dethroned
  • 2
    All in one development service
  • 2
    Good tools support
  • 2
    Free HTML hostings
  • 2
    IAM integration
  • 2
    Very Easy to Use
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Leads the copycats
  • 2
    Free private repos
  • 1
    Profound
  • 1
    Dasf
CONS OF GITHUB
  • 55
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
  • 4
    Limited featureset for issue management
  • 3
    Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
  • 2
    GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
  • 1
    No multilingual interface
  • 1
    Takes a long time to commit
  • 1
    Expensive

related GitHub posts

Johnny Bell

I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

See more

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

See more
SVN (Subversion) logo

SVN (Subversion)

801
43
Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses
801
43
PROS OF SVN (SUBVERSION)
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Simple code versioning
  • 5
    User/Access Management
  • 3
    Complicated code versionioning by Subversion
  • 2
    Free
CONS OF SVN (SUBVERSION)
  • 7
    Branching and tagging use tons of disk space

related SVN (Subversion) posts

I use Visual Studio Code because at this time is a mature software and I can do practically everything using it.

  • It's free and open source: The project is hosted on GitHub and it’s free to download, fork, modify and contribute to the project.

  • Multi-platform: You can download binaries for different platforms, included Windows (x64), MacOS and Linux (.rpm and .deb packages)

  • LightWeight: It runs smoothly in different devices. It has an average memory and CPU usage. Starts almost immediately and it’s very stable.

  • Extended language support: Supports by default the majority of the most used languages and syntax like JavaScript, HTML, C#, Swift, Java, PHP, Python and others. Also, VS Code supports different file types associated to projects like .ini, .properties, XML and JSON files.

  • Integrated tools: Includes an integrated terminal, debugger, problem list and console output inspector. The project navigator sidebar is simple and powerful: you can manage your files and folders with ease. The command palette helps you find commands by text. The search widget has a powerful auto-complete feature to search and find your files.

  • Extensible and configurable: There are many extensions available for every language supported, including syntax highlighters, IntelliSense and code completion, and debuggers. There are also extension to manage application configuration and architecture like Docker and Jenkins.

  • Integrated with Git: You can visually manage your project repositories, pull, commit and push your changes, and easy conflict resolution.( there is support for SVN (Subversion) users by plugin)

See more
rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 8 upvotes · 193.1K views
Shared insights
on
GitGitSVN (Subversion)SVN (Subversion)
at

I use Git instead of SVN (Subversion) because it allows us to scale our development team. At any given time, the Zulip open source project has hundreds of open pull requests from tens of contributors, each in various stages of the pipeline. Git's workflow makes it very easy to context switch between different feature branches.

See more
Bitbucket logo

Bitbucket

40.5K
2.8K
One place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private repositories
40.5K
2.8K
PROS OF BITBUCKET
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
  • 123
    Integrates with many apis and services
  • 119
    Reliable uptime
  • 87
    Nice gui
  • 85
    Pull requests and code reviews
  • 58
    Very customisable
  • 16
    Mercurial repositories
  • 14
    SourceTree integration
  • 12
    JIRA integration
  • 10
    Track every commit to an issue in JIRA
  • 8
    Deployment hooks
  • 8
    Best free alternative to Github
  • 7
    Automatically share repositories with all your teammates
  • 7
    Source Code Insight
  • 7
    Compatible with Mac and Windows
  • 6
    Price
  • 5
    Login with Google
  • 5
    Create a wiki
  • 5
    Approve pull request button
  • 4
    Customizable pipelines
  • 4
    #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA
  • 3
    Unlimited Private Repos at no cost
  • 3
    Also supports Mercurial
  • 3
    Continuous Integration and Delivery
  • 2
    Mercurial Support
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    Teamcity
  • 2
    Open source friendly
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
    IAM
  • 2
    Academic license program
  • 2
    IAM integration
CONS OF BITBUCKET
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
  • 7
    Complexity with rights management
  • 6
    Only 5 collaborators for private repos
  • 4
    Slow performance
  • 2
    No AWS Codepipelines integration
  • 1
    No more Mercurial repositories
  • 1
    No server side git-hook support

related Bitbucket posts

Michael Kelly
Senior Software Engineer at StackShare · | 14 upvotes · 956.6K views

I use GitLab when building side-projects and MVPs. The interface and interactions are close enough to those of GitHub to prevent cognitive switching costs between professional and personal projects hosted on different services.

GitLab also provides a suite of tools including issue/project management, CI/CD with GitLab CI, and validation/landing pages with GitLab Pages. With everything in one place, on an #OpenSourceCloud GitLab makes it easy for me to manage much larger projects on my own, than would be possible with other solutions or tools.

It's petty I know, but I can also read the GitLab code diffs far more easily than diffs on GitHub or Bitbucket...they just look better in my opinion.

See more
Shared insights
on
GitHubGitHubGitLabGitLabBitbucketBitbucket

A bit difference in GitHub and GitLab though both are Version Control repository management services which provides key component in the software development workflow. A decision of choosing GitHub over GitLab is major leap extension from code management, to deployment and monitoring alongside looking beyond the code base hosting provided best fitted tools for developer communities.

  • Authentication stages - With GitLab you can set and modify people’s permissions according to their role. In GitHub, you can decide if someone gets a read or write access to a repository.
  • Built-In Continuous Integrations - GitLab offers its very own CI for free. No need to use an external CI service. And if you are already used to an external CI, you can obviously integrate with Jenkins, etc whereas GitHub offers various 3rd party integrations – such as Travis CI, CircleCI or Codeship – for running and testing your code. However, there’s no built-in CI solution at the moment.
  • Import/Export Resources - GitLab offers detailed documentation on how to import your data from other vendors – such as GitHub, Bitbucket to GitLab. GitHub, on the other hand, does not offer such detailed documentation for the most common git repositories. However, GitHub offers to use GitHub Importer if you have your source code in Subversion, Mercurial, TFS and others.

Also when it comes to exporting data, GitLab seems to do a pretty solid job, offering you the ability to export your projects including the following data:

  • Wiki and project repositories
  • Project uploads
  • The configuration including webhooks and services
  • Issues with comments, merge requests with diffs and comments, labels, milestones, snippets, and other project entities.

GitHub, on the other hand, seems to be more restrictive when it comes to export features of existing GitHub repositories. * Integrations - #githubmarketplace gives you an essence to have multiple and competitive integrations whereas you will find less in the GitLab.

So go ahead with better understanding.

See more
Perforce logo

Perforce

83
9
Version Control Software
83
9
PROS OF PERFORCE
  • 3
    Powerful
  • 3
    Great for Enterprise level use
  • 2
    Robust
  • 1
    Scalable
CONS OF PERFORCE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Perforce posts

    Mercurial logo

    Mercurial

    232
    105
    A free, distributed source control management tool
    232
    105
    PROS OF MERCURIAL
    • 18
      A lot easier to extend than git
    • 17
      Easy-to-grasp system with nice tools
    • 13
      Works on windows natively without cygwin nonsense
    • 11
      Written in python
    • 9
      Free
    • 8
      Fast
    • 6
      Better than Git
    • 6
      Best GUI
    • 4
      Better than svn
    • 2
      Hg inc
    • 2
      Good user experience
    • 2
      TortoiseHg - Unified free gui for all platforms
    • 2
      Consistent UI
    • 2
      Easy-to-use
    • 2
      Native support to all platforms
    • 1
      Free to use
    CONS OF MERCURIAL
    • 0
      Track single upstream only
    • 0
      Does not distinguish between local and remote head

    related Mercurial posts

    Tim Abbott
    Shared insights
    on
    GitGitMercurialMercurial
    at

    I've been excited about Git ever since it got a built-in UI. It's the perfect combination of a really solid, simple data model, which allows an experienced user to predict precisely what a Git subcommand will do, often without needing to read the documentation (see the slides linked from the attached article for details). Most important to me as the lead developer of a large open source project (Zulip) is that it makes it possible to build a really clean, clear development history that I regularly use to understand details of our code history that are critical to making correct changes.

    And it performs really, really well. In 2014, I managed Dropbox's migration from Mercurial to Git. And just switching tools made just about every common operation (git status, git log, git commit etc.) 2-10x faster than with Mercurial. It makes sense if you think about it, since Git was designed to perform well with Linux, one of the largest open source projects out there, but it was still a huge productivity increase that we got basically for free.

    If you're learning Git, I highly recommend reading the other sections of Zulip's Git Guide; we get a lot of positive feedback from developers on it being a useful resource even for their projects unrelated to Zulip.

    See more
    GitLab logo

    GitLab

    61.9K
    2.5K
    Open source self-hosted Git management software
    61.9K
    2.5K
    PROS OF GITLAB
    • 508
      Self hosted
    • 431
      Free
    • 339
      Has community edition
    • 242
      Easy setup
    • 240
      Familiar interface
    • 137
      Includes many features, including ci
    • 113
      Nice UI
    • 84
      Good integration with gitlabci
    • 57
      Simple setup
    • 35
      Has an official mobile app
    • 34
      Free private repository
    • 31
      Continuous Integration
    • 23
      Open source, great ui (like github)
    • 18
      Slack Integration
    • 15
      Full CI flow
    • 11
      Free and unlimited private git repos
    • 10
      All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
    • 10
      User, group, and project access management is simple
    • 8
      Intuitive UI
    • 8
      Built-in CI
    • 6
      Full DevOps suite with Git
    • 6
      Both public and private Repositories
    • 5
      Integrated Docker Registry
    • 5
      So easy to use
    • 5
      CI
    • 5
      Build/pipeline definition alongside code
    • 5
      It's powerful source code management tool
    • 4
      Dockerized
    • 4
      It's fully integrated
    • 4
      On-premises
    • 4
      Security and Stable
    • 4
      Unlimited free repos & collaborators
    • 4
      Not Microsoft Owned
    • 4
      Excellent
    • 4
      Issue system
    • 4
      Mattermost Chat client
    • 3
      Great for team collaboration
    • 3
      Free private repos
    • 3
      Because is the best remote host for git repositories
    • 3
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 3
      Opensource
    • 3
      Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
    • 3
      I like the its runners and executors feature
    • 2
      Beautiful
    • 2
      Groups of groups
    • 2
      Multilingual interface
    • 2
      Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
    • 2
      Review Apps feature
    • 2
      Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
    • 2
      One-click install through DigitalOcean
    • 2
      Powerful Continuous Integration System
    • 2
      It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
    • 2
      The dashboard with deployed environments
    • 2
      HipChat intergration
    • 2
      Many private repo
    • 2
      Kubernetes Integration
    • 2
      Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
    • 2
      Wounderful
    • 2
      Native CI
    • 1
      Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits
    CONS OF GITLAB
    • 28
      Slow ui performance
    • 9
      Introduce breaking bugs every release
    • 6
      Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
    • 2
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 1
      Review Apps feature

    related GitLab posts

    Tim Abbott
    Shared insights
    on
    GitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab
    at

    I have mixed feelings on GitHub as a product and our use of it for the Zulip open source project. On the one hand, I do feel that being on GitHub helps people discover Zulip, because we have enough stars (etc.) that we rank highly among projects on the platform. and there is a definite benefit for lowering barriers to contribution (which is important to us) that GitHub has such a dominant position in terms of what everyone has accounts with.

    But even ignoring how one might feel about their new corporate owner (MicroSoft), in a lot of ways GitHub is a bad product for open source projects. Years after the "Dear GitHub" letter, there are still basic gaps in its issue tracker:

    • You can't give someone permission to label/categorize issues without full write access to a project (including ability to merge things to master, post releases, etc.).
    • You can't let anyone with a GitHub account self-assign issues to themselves.
    • Many more similar issues.

    It's embarrassing, because I've talked to GitHub product managers at various open source events about these things for 3 years, and they always agree the thing is important, but then nothing ever improves in the Issues product. Maybe the new management at MicroSoft will fix their product management situation, but if not, I imagine we'll eventually do the migration to GitLab.

    We have a custom bot project, http://github.com/zulip/zulipbot, to deal with some of these issues where possible, and every other large project we talk to does the same thing, more or less.

    See more
    Joshua Dean Küpper
    CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 20 upvotes · 742.6K views

    We use GitLab CI because of the great native integration as a part of the GitLab framework and the linting-capabilities it offers. The visualization of complex pipelines and the embedding within the project overview made Gitlab CI even more convenient. We use it for all projects, all deployments and as a part of GitLab Pages.

    While we initially used the Shell-executor, we quickly switched to the Docker-executor and use it exclusively now.

    We formerly used Jenkins but preferred to handle everything within GitLab . Aside from the unification of our infrastructure another motivation was the "configuration-in-file"-approach, that Gitlab CI offered, while Jenkins support of this concept was very limited and users had to resort to using the webinterface. Since the file is included within the repository, it is also version controlled, which was a huge plus for us.

    See more
    C lang logo

    C lang

    13.7K
    252
    One of the most widely used programming languages of all time
    13.7K
    252
    PROS OF C LANG
    • 68
      Performance
    • 49
      Low-level
    • 36
      Portability
    • 29
      Hardware level
    • 19
      Embedded apps
    • 13
      Pure
    • 9
      Performance of assembler
    • 8
      Ubiquity
    • 6
      Great for embedded
    • 4
      Compiles quickly
    • 4
      Old
    • 3
      No garbage collection to slow it down
    • 2
      Gnu/linux interoperable
    • 2
      OpenMP
    CONS OF C LANG
    • 5
      Low-level
    • 3
      No built in support for parallelism (e.g. map-reduce)
    • 3
      Lack of type safety
    • 3
      No built in support for concurrency

    related C lang posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 17 upvotes · 2.1M views

    Why Uber developed H3, our open source grid system to make geospatial data visualization and exploration easier and more efficient:

    We decided to create H3 to combine the benefits of a hexagonal global grid system with a hierarchical indexing system. A global grid system usually requires at least two things: a map projection and a grid laid on top of the map. For map projection, we chose to use gnomonic projections centered on icosahedron faces. This projects from Earth as a sphere to an icosahedron, a twenty-sided platonic solid. The H3 grid is constructed by laying out 122 base cells over the Earth, with ten cells per face. H3 supports sixteen resolutions: https://eng.uber.com/h3/

    (GitHub Pages : https://uber.github.io/h3/#/ Written in C w/ bindings in Java & JavaScript )

    See more

    One important decision for delivering a platform independent solution with low memory footprint and minimal dependencies was the choice of the programming language. We considered a few from Python (there was already a reasonably large Python code base at Thumbtack), to Go (we were taking our first steps with it), and even Rust (too immature at the time).

    We ended up writing it in C. It was easy to meet all requirements with only one external dependency for implementing the web server, clearly no challenges running it on any of the Linux distributions we were maintaining, and arguably the implementation with the smallest memory footprint given the choices above.

    See more
    Git Flow logo

    Git Flow

    95
    0
    A set of git extensions to provide high-level repository operations
    95
    0
    PROS OF GIT FLOW
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF GIT FLOW
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Git Flow posts