GLBC vs HAProxy

Overview

HAProxy

Stacks2.6K

Followers2.1K

Votes564

GLBC

Stacks49

Followers53

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks316

GLBC vs HAProxy: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing GLBC (Google Cloud Load Balancer) with HAProxy, there are several key differences that can impact decision-making for web infrastructure deployment.

SSL Offloading: One significant difference between GLBC and HAProxy is the handling of SSL offloading. GLBC provides SSL offloading as a managed service, reducing the burden on the backend servers, while HAProxy requires manual configuration for SSL termination.
Scalability: GLBC offers automatic scaling to handle fluctuations in traffic, ensuring a seamless user experience during peak times. On the other hand, HAProxy may require additional configuration and monitoring to handle scalability efficiently.
Integration with Google Cloud Services: GLBC seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), enabling better synergy within the Google Cloud ecosystem. HAProxy, while versatile, may require more effort for seamless integration with Google Cloud services.
Ease of Management: GLBC offers a user-friendly interface for managing load balancing configurations, making it easier for administrators to set up and monitor load balancing rules. HAProxy, while powerful, may require more technical expertise for effective management.
Cost: GLBC is a managed service offered by Google Cloud, which means pricing is included in the overall cloud service costs, making it easier to budget for. HAProxy, being an open-source solution, may have lower upfront costs but could potentially incur additional expenses for maintenance and support.
Community Support: HAProxy has a thriving community with active forums and resources for troubleshooting and customization. In contrast, while GLBC has robust Google Cloud support, community-driven support may be limited compared to HAProxy.

In Summary, when considering between GLBC and HAProxy, factors such as SSL offloading, scalability, integration with Google Cloud services, ease of management, cost, and community support play a crucial role in decision-making for web infrastructure deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

HAProxy	GLBC
HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.	It is a GCE L7 load balancer controller that manages external loadbalancers configured through the Kubernetes Ingress API.
-	Manages external loadbalancers; Configured through the Kubernetes Ingress API
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 316
Stacks 2.6K	Stacks 49
Followers 2.1K	Followers 53
Votes 564	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 134 Load balancer 102 High performance 69 Very fast 58 Proxying for tcp and http 55 SSL termination Cons 6 Becomes your single point of failure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to HAProxy, GLBC?

Traefik

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

node-http-proxy

node-http-proxy is an HTTP programmable proxying library that supports websockets. It is suitable for implementing components such as proxies and load balancers.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

DigitalOcean Load Balancer

Load Balancers are a highly available, fully-managed service that work right out of the box and can be deployed as fast as a Droplet. Load Balancers distribute incoming traffic across your infrastructure to increase your application's availability.

F5 BIG-IP

It ensures that applications are always secure and perform the way they should. You get built-in security, traffic management, and performance application services, whether your applications live in a private data center or in the cloud.

Google Cloud Load Balancing

You can scale your applications on Google Compute Engine from zero to full-throttle with it, with no pre-warming needed. You can distribute your load-balanced compute resources in single or multiple regions, close to your users and to meet your high availability requirements.

Related Comparisons

GLBC vs HAProxy: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing GLBC (Google Cloud Load Balancer) with HAProxy, there are several key differences that can impact decision-making for web infrastructure deployment.

SSL Offloading: One significant difference between GLBC and HAProxy is the handling of SSL offloading. GLBC provides SSL offloading as a managed service, reducing the burden on the backend servers, while HAProxy requires manual configuration for SSL termination.
Scalability: GLBC offers automatic scaling to handle fluctuations in traffic, ensuring a seamless user experience during peak times. On the other hand, HAProxy may require additional configuration and monitoring to handle scalability efficiently.
Integration with Google Cloud Services: GLBC seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), enabling better synergy within the Google Cloud ecosystem. HAProxy, while versatile, may require more effort for seamless integration with Google Cloud services.
Ease of Management: GLBC offers a user-friendly interface for managing load balancing configurations, making it easier for administrators to set up and monitor load balancing rules. HAProxy, while powerful, may require more technical expertise for effective management.
Cost: GLBC is a managed service offered by Google Cloud, which means pricing is included in the overall cloud service costs, making it easier to budget for. HAProxy, being an open-source solution, may have lower upfront costs but could potentially incur additional expenses for maintenance and support.
Community Support: HAProxy has a thriving community with active forums and resources for troubleshooting and customization. In contrast, while GLBC has robust Google Cloud support, community-driven support may be limited compared to HAProxy.

GLBC vs HAProxy

Overview