Grails vs JHipster

Overview

Grails

Stacks384

Followers373

Votes333

JHipster

Stacks200

Followers327

Votes0

GitHub Stars22.2K

Forks4.1K

Grails vs JHipster: What are the differences?

Language and Framework: Grails is based on the Groovy language and follows the convention-over-configuration paradigm, whereas JHipster is more focused on generating applications using Spring Boot for the backend and Angular/React/Vue for the frontend.
Architecture: Grails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern for structuring applications, while JHipster promotes the use of microservices architecture with a focus on RESTful APIs.
Community and Ecosystem: Grails has a smaller but dedicated community with a strong focus on plugins and extensions, whereas JHipster has a large and active community with a significant emphasis on generating boilerplate code for faster development.
Code Generation: JHipster provides a powerful code generation tool that can scaffold CRUD operations, entities, and other functionalities, while Grails relies more on a plugin ecosystem for adding functionality to the framework.
Frontend Integration: JHipster seamlessly integrates with modern frontend frameworks like Angular, React, or Vue, providing options for single-page applications, whereas there is more flexibility in choosing frontend technologies in Grails with less integration out-of-the-box.
Deployment and Scalability: JHipster simplifies the deployment process with Docker and Kubernetes support, making it easier to scale applications, while Grails requires more manual configuration for deployment and scaling.

In Summary, Grails and JHipster differ in their languages, architectures, community support, code generation capabilities, frontend integration, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grails	JHipster
Grails is a framework used to build web applications with the Groovy programming language. The core framework is very extensible and there are numerous plugins available that provide easy integration of add-on features.	It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.
FLAT LEARNING CURVE; ON TOP OF SPRING BOOT; SMOOTH JAVA INTEGRATION; REST APIS, REACT, ANGULAR	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 22.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.1K
Stacks 384	Stacks 200
Followers 373	Followers 327
Votes 333	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 56 Groovy 40 Jvm 38 Rapid development 37 Gorm 30 Web framework Cons 3 Frequent breaking changes 2 Undocumented features	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sublime Text IntelliJ IDEA Eclipse Java Spring Boot React TextMate AngularJS Groovy	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Grails, JHipster?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Grails vs JHipster: What are the differences?

Language and Framework: Grails is based on the Groovy language and follows the convention-over-configuration paradigm, whereas JHipster is more focused on generating applications using Spring Boot for the backend and Angular/React/Vue for the frontend.
Architecture: Grails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern for structuring applications, while JHipster promotes the use of microservices architecture with a focus on RESTful APIs.
Community and Ecosystem: Grails has a smaller but dedicated community with a strong focus on plugins and extensions, whereas JHipster has a large and active community with a significant emphasis on generating boilerplate code for faster development.
Code Generation: JHipster provides a powerful code generation tool that can scaffold CRUD operations, entities, and other functionalities, while Grails relies more on a plugin ecosystem for adding functionality to the framework.
Frontend Integration: JHipster seamlessly integrates with modern frontend frameworks like Angular, React, or Vue, providing options for single-page applications, whereas there is more flexibility in choosing frontend technologies in Grails with less integration out-of-the-box.
Deployment and Scalability: JHipster simplifies the deployment process with Docker and Kubernetes support, making it easier to scale applications, while Grails requires more manual configuration for deployment and scaling.

In Summary, Grails and JHipster differ in their languages, architectures, community support, code generation capabilities, frontend integration, and deployment options.

Grails vs JHipster

Overview