Grails vs Next.js

Overview

Grails

Stacks384

Followers373

Votes333

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Grails vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Language and Platform: Grails is built on top of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and uses the Groovy programming language, while Next.js is built on JavaScript and runs on Node.js. This difference in language and platform affects the development workflow and the type of applications that can be built using these frameworks.
Architecture and Structure: Grails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern for organizing code and separating concerns, whereas Next.js uses a file-based routing system that simplifies the creation of pages and components. This difference in architecture influences how developers structure their applications and manage the flow of data.
Performance and Scalability: Grails, being built on the JVM, offers better performance and scalability for enterprise-level applications that require high reliability and speed. In contrast, Next.js, being a lightweight framework based on JavaScript, is more suitable for smaller projects and front-end development.
Community and Ecosystem: Grails has a mature and established community with a wide range of plugins and libraries available for developers to use. Next.js, on the other hand, has a growing community and an ecosystem centered around React and the Node.js community, offering different sets of tools and resources.
Deployment and Hosting: Grails applications are typically deployed on a traditional application server like Apache Tomcat or Jetty, while Next.js applications can be easily hosted on any server that supports Node.js. This difference in deployment options can impact the choice of hosting providers and the overall deployment process.
Learning Curve and Documentation: Grails, with its Java and Groovy background, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these languages. Next.js, being based on JavaScript, may be easier for front-end developers to pick up, with comprehensive documentation and resources available for learning.

In Summary, Grails and Next.js differ in language, architecture, performance, community, deployment, and learning curve, catering to different types of projects and developer preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Grails, Next.js

Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k

Comments

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Grails	Next.js
Grails is a framework used to build web applications with the Groovy programming language. The core framework is very extensible and there are numerous plugins available that provide easy integration of add-on features.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
FLAT LEARNING CURVE; ON TOP OF SPRING BOOT; SMOOTH JAVA INTEGRATION; REST APIS, REACT, ANGULAR	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 384	Stacks 8.0K
Followers 373	Followers 5.1K
Votes 333	Votes 330
Pros & Cons
Pros 56 Groovy 40 Jvm 38 Rapid development 37 Gorm 30 Web framework Cons 3 Frequent breaking changes 2 Undocumented features	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Sublime Text IntelliJ IDEA Eclipse Java Spring Boot React TextMate AngularJS Groovy	React

What are some alternatives to Grails, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Grails vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Language and Platform: Grails is built on top of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and uses the Groovy programming language, while Next.js is built on JavaScript and runs on Node.js. This difference in language and platform affects the development workflow and the type of applications that can be built using these frameworks.
Architecture and Structure: Grails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern for organizing code and separating concerns, whereas Next.js uses a file-based routing system that simplifies the creation of pages and components. This difference in architecture influences how developers structure their applications and manage the flow of data.
Performance and Scalability: Grails, being built on the JVM, offers better performance and scalability for enterprise-level applications that require high reliability and speed. In contrast, Next.js, being a lightweight framework based on JavaScript, is more suitable for smaller projects and front-end development.
Community and Ecosystem: Grails has a mature and established community with a wide range of plugins and libraries available for developers to use. Next.js, on the other hand, has a growing community and an ecosystem centered around React and the Node.js community, offering different sets of tools and resources.
Deployment and Hosting: Grails applications are typically deployed on a traditional application server like Apache Tomcat or Jetty, while Next.js applications can be easily hosted on any server that supports Node.js. This difference in deployment options can impact the choice of hosting providers and the overall deployment process.
Learning Curve and Documentation: Grails, with its Java and Groovy background, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these languages. Next.js, being based on JavaScript, may be easier for front-end developers to pick up, with comprehensive documentation and resources available for learning.

Grails vs Next.js

Overview