StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Grunt vs rollup

Grunt vs rollup

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grunt
Grunt
Stacks8.8K
Followers5.6K
Votes697
GitHub Stars12.3K
Forks1.5K
rollup
rollup
Stacks2.4K
Followers164
Votes17

Grunt vs rollup: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Grunt and Rollup are both popular build tools commonly used in web development. While they may serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different scenarios. It is important to understand these differences in order to choose the right tool for your project.

  1. Configuration vs. Bundling Approach: Grunt focuses on task-based configuration where developers define individual tasks to be executed in a specific order. It provides a wide range of plugins for tasks such as minification, concatenation, and linting. On the other hand, Rollup takes a module-based bundling approach, allowing developers to bundle multiple modules together and create optimized outputs. This modular approach can result in smaller bundle sizes and better performance.

  2. Dynamic vs. Static Analysis: Grunt operates on a file-based approach, performing actions on each file individually. This can be useful for applying tasks to a large set of files or folders. Rollup, on the other hand, performs static analysis on the dependency graph of the modules being bundled. This allows it to optimize the bundle by removing dead code and tree-shaking unused dependencies, resulting in more efficient and smaller bundles.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: Grunt has a vast ecosystem of plugins available, providing a wide range of tasks and automation options. These plugins can be easily integrated into the Grunt workflow, allowing developers to accomplish various tasks without writing custom code. Rollup, on the other hand, has a smaller but growing ecosystem of plugins specifically focused on bundling and optimizing JavaScript modules.

  4. Configurability vs. Simplicity: Grunt offers a high level of configurability, allowing developers to fine-tune the build process by specifying various options and settings. This flexibility comes at the cost of complexity, as configuring Grunt tasks can become cumbersome, especially for larger projects. Rollup, on the other hand, follows a simpler and more opinionated approach, providing sensible defaults and requiring less configuration.

  5. Code Transformations: Grunt provides a wide range of code transformation plugins, allowing tasks such as code minification, transpilation, and linting. Rollup, while primarily focused on bundling, also supports code transformations through plugins. However, its primary goal is to bundle modules together, rather than performing extensive code transformations.

  6. Toolchain Integration: Grunt is designed to work well with existing toolchains, allowing it to be easily integrated into various workflows and environments. It can be used alongside other build tools like Bower or npm scripts. Rollup, on the other hand, is more focused on JavaScript module bundling and is often used as part of a modern JavaScript development stack, integrated with tools like npm, webpack, or Babel.

In Summary, Grunt and Rollup differ in their approach to build processes, with Grunt focusing on task-based configuration and providing a wide range of plugins, while Rollup takes a modular bundling approach with static analysis and optimization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Grunt, rollup

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Grunt
Grunt
rollup
rollup

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.8K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
5.6K
Followers
164
Votes
697
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 288
    Configuration
  • 176
    Open source
  • 166
    Automation of minification and live reload
  • 60
    Great community
  • 7
    SASS compilation
Cons
  • 1
    Poor mindshare/community support
Pros
  • 4
    Makes it easy to publish packages
  • 3
    Easier configuration
  • 2
    Provides smaller bundle size
  • 2
    Better tree shaking
  • 1
    Very flexible
Cons
  • 1
    No clear path for static assets
  • 1
    Manual Chunking is a bit buggy
  • 1
    Almost everything needs to be a Plugin
  • 1
    No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)

What are some alternatives to Grunt, rollup?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana