Alternatives to Guice logo

Alternatives to Guice

Spring, CDI, Mockito, JavaScript, and Python are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Guice.
58
62
+ 1
0

What is Guice and what are its top alternatives?

Google Guice is a lightweight dependency injection framework for Java, offering a simple and flexible way to manage the dependencies of your application. It allows you to define your modules and use annotations to wire up your objects. Guice promotes a modular approach to application design and makes it easy to unit test your code. However, one limitation of Guice is that it lacks built-in support for aspect-oriented programming.

  1. Spring Framework: Spring is a comprehensive framework that provides support for various functionalities including dependency injection. It offers a wide range of features such as aspect-oriented programming, transaction management, and MVC framework. Pros include robust community support and extensive documentation, while cons may include a steep learning curve for beginners.
  2. Dagger 2: Dagger 2 is a fast and lightweight dependency injection framework for Java and Android. It generates code at compile time, leading to efficient and performant injection. Pros include improved performance and compile-time validation, but it may be more complex to set up compared to Guice.
  3. CDI (Contexts and Dependency Injection): CDI is a standard introduced in Java EE for dependency injection, providing a unified approach to managing beans in a Java application. Key features include scopes and qualifiers for managing dependencies effectively. Pros include standardization and seamless integration with Java EE technologies, while cons may include limited support for standalone applications.
  4. PicoContainer: PicoContainer is a lightweight dependency injection container that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It allows you to wire up your components with minimal configuration. Pros include simplicity and a small footprint, but it may lack some advanced features compared to Guice.
  5. HK2: HK2 is a lightweight and flexible dependency injection framework designed for Java EE applications. It offers features such as service locators and automatic lifecycle management. Pros include seamless integration with Java EE components, while cons may include limited community support.
  6. Micronaut: Micronaut is a modern JVM framework that provides built-in support for dependency injection. It focuses on performance and low memory usage by eliminating runtime reflection. Pros include fast startup time and reduced memory footprint, but it may require additional effort in setting up compared to Guice.
  7. Arc: Arc is a lightweight and high-performance dependency injection container for Java. It aims to be fast and efficient while providing an easy-to-use API for managing dependencies. Pros include speed and efficiency, but it may have limited features compared to more established frameworks like Guice.
  8. Guicey: Guicey is an extension for Google Guice that adds extra features and enhancements to the core framework. It provides additional utilities for configuring bindings and managing dependencies in a Guice-based application. Pros include compatibility with existing Guice codebase, while cons may include potential maintenance overhead.
  9. Seam: Seam is a comprehensive Java EE framework that offers support for dependency injection along with features such as conversation management and remoting. It aims to simplify the development of Java EE applications by providing a unified programming model. Pros include integration with other Java EE technologies, while cons may include a legacy codebase and potential complexity.
  10. Weld: Weld is an implementation of the CDI specification that provides features for dependency injection in Java EE applications. It offers support for scopes, interceptors, and decorators to manage dependencies effectively. Pros include compliance with Java EE standards, while cons may include a learning curve for developers new to the CDI specification.

Top Alternatives to Guice

  • Spring
    Spring

    A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments. ...

  • CDI
    CDI

    It is a standard dependency injection framework included in Java EE 6 and higher. It allows us to manage the lifecycle of stateful components via domain-specific lifecycle contexts and inject components (services) into client objects in a type-safe way. ...

  • Mockito
    Mockito

    It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

  • PHP
    PHP

    Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world. ...

Guice alternatives & related posts

Spring logo

Spring

4K
1.1K
Provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications
4K
1.1K
PROS OF SPRING
  • 230
    Java
  • 157
    Open source
  • 136
    Great community
  • 123
    Very powerful
  • 114
    Enterprise
  • 64
    Lot of great subprojects
  • 60
    Easy setup
  • 44
    Convention , configuration, done
  • 40
    Standard
  • 31
    Love the logic
  • 13
    Good documentation
  • 11
    Dependency injection
  • 11
    Stability
  • 9
    MVC
  • 6
    Easy
  • 3
    Makes the hard stuff fun & the easy stuff automatic
  • 3
    Strong typing
  • 2
    Code maintenance
  • 2
    Best practices
  • 2
    Maven
  • 2
    Great Desgin
  • 2
    Easy Integration with Spring Security
  • 2
    Integrations with most other Java frameworks
  • 1
    Java has more support and more libraries
  • 1
    Supports vast databases
  • 1
    Large ecosystem with seamless integration
  • 1
    OracleDb integration
  • 1
    Live project
CONS OF SPRING
  • 15
    Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat
  • 4
    Poor documentation
  • 3
    Verbose configuration
  • 3
    Java
  • 2
    Java is more verbose language in compare to python
  • 1
    Very difficult

related Spring posts

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

See more

I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.

See more
CDI logo

CDI

30
0
A standard dependency injection framework
30
0
PROS OF CDI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF CDI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related CDI posts

      Mockito logo

      Mockito

      1.8K
      0
      Tasty mocking framework for unit tests in Java
      1.8K
      0
      PROS OF MOCKITO
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF MOCKITO
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Mockito posts

          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          371.3K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          371.3K
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 899
            Fast
          • 746
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Easy
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            Nice
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            What to add
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Easy to learn and test
          • 1
            Love it
          • 1
            Test
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Python logo

          Python

          250.4K
          6.9K
          A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
          250.4K
          6.9K
          PROS OF PYTHON
          • 1.2K
            Great libraries
          • 965
            Readable code
          • 848
            Beautiful code
          • 789
            Rapid development
          • 692
            Large community
          • 439
            Open source
          • 394
            Elegant
          • 283
            Great community
          • 274
            Object oriented
          • 222
            Dynamic typing
          • 78
            Great standard library
          • 62
            Very fast
          • 56
            Functional programming
          • 52
            Easy to learn
          • 47
            Scientific computing
          • 36
            Great documentation
          • 30
            Productivity
          • 29
            Matlab alternative
          • 29
            Easy to read
          • 25
            Simple is better than complex
          • 21
            It's the way I think
          • 20
            Imperative
          • 19
            Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
          • 19
            Free
          • 17
            Powerfull language
          • 17
            Machine learning support
          • 16
            Fast and simple
          • 14
            Scripting
          • 12
            Explicit is better than implicit
          • 11
            Ease of development
          • 10
            Clear and easy and powerfull
          • 9
            Unlimited power
          • 8
            It's lean and fun to code
          • 8
            Import antigravity
          • 7
            Print "life is short, use python"
          • 7
            Python has great libraries for data processing
          • 6
            Although practicality beats purity
          • 6
            Fast coding and good for competitions
          • 6
            There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
          • 6
            High Documented language
          • 6
            Readability counts
          • 6
            Rapid Prototyping
          • 6
            I love snakes
          • 6
            Now is better than never
          • 6
            Flat is better than nested
          • 6
            Great for tooling
          • 5
            Great for analytics
          • 5
            Web scraping
          • 5
            Lists, tuples, dictionaries
          • 4
            Complex is better than complicated
          • 4
            Socially engaged community
          • 4
            Plotting
          • 4
            Beautiful is better than ugly
          • 4
            Easy to learn and use
          • 4
            Easy to setup and run smooth
          • 4
            Simple and easy to learn
          • 4
            Multiple Inheritence
          • 4
            CG industry needs
          • 3
            List comprehensions
          • 3
            Powerful language for AI
          • 3
            Flexible and easy
          • 3
            It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
          • 3
            Many types of collections
          • 3
            If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
          • 3
            If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
          • 3
            Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
          • 3
            Pip install everything
          • 3
            No cruft
          • 3
            Generators
          • 3
            Import this
          • 2
            Can understand easily who are new to programming
          • 2
            Securit
          • 2
            Should START with this but not STICK with This
          • 2
            A-to-Z
          • 2
            Because of Netflix
          • 2
            Only one way to do it
          • 2
            Better outcome
          • 2
            Good for hacking
          • 2
            Batteries included
          • 2
            Procedural programming
          • 1
            Sexy af
          • 1
            Automation friendly
          • 1
            Slow
          • 1
            Best friend for NLP
          • 0
            Powerful
          • 0
            Keep it simple
          • 0
            Ni
          CONS OF PYTHON
          • 53
            Still divided between python 2 and python 3
          • 28
            Performance impact
          • 26
            Poor syntax for anonymous functions
          • 22
            GIL
          • 19
            Package management is a mess
          • 14
            Too imperative-oriented
          • 12
            Hard to understand
          • 12
            Dynamic typing
          • 12
            Very slow
          • 8
            Indentations matter a lot
          • 8
            Not everything is expression
          • 7
            Incredibly slow
          • 7
            Explicit self parameter in methods
          • 6
            Requires C functions for dynamic modules
          • 6
            Poor DSL capabilities
          • 6
            No anonymous functions
          • 5
            Fake object-oriented programming
          • 5
            Threading
          • 5
            The "lisp style" whitespaces
          • 5
            Official documentation is unclear.
          • 5
            Hard to obfuscate
          • 5
            Circular import
          • 4
            Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
          • 4
            The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
          • 4
            Not suitable for autocomplete
          • 2
            Meta classes
          • 1
            Training wheels (forced indentation)

          related Python posts

          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

          Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

          It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

          I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

          What do you think about TensorFlow?

          Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

          See more
          Node.js logo

          Node.js

          193K
          8.5K
          A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
          193K
          8.5K
          PROS OF NODE.JS
          • 1.4K
            Npm
          • 1.3K
            Javascript
          • 1.1K
            Great libraries
          • 1K
            High-performance
          • 805
            Open source
          • 487
            Great for apis
          • 477
            Asynchronous
          • 425
            Great community
          • 390
            Great for realtime apps
          • 296
            Great for command line utilities
          • 86
            Websockets
          • 84
            Node Modules
          • 69
            Uber Simple
          • 59
            Great modularity
          • 58
            Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
          • 42
            Easy to start
          • 35
            Great for Data Streaming
          • 32
            Realtime
          • 28
            Awesome
          • 25
            Non blocking IO
          • 18
            Can be used as a proxy
          • 17
            High performance, open source, scalable
          • 16
            Non-blocking and modular
          • 15
            Easy and Fun
          • 14
            Easy and powerful
          • 13
            Future of BackEnd
          • 13
            Same lang as AngularJS
          • 12
            Fullstack
          • 11
            Fast
          • 10
            Scalability
          • 10
            Cross platform
          • 9
            Simple
          • 8
            Mean Stack
          • 7
            Great for webapps
          • 7
            Easy concurrency
          • 6
            Typescript
          • 6
            Fast, simple code and async
          • 6
            React
          • 6
            Friendly
          • 5
            Control everything
          • 5
            Its amazingly fast and scalable
          • 5
            Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
          • 5
            Scalable
          • 5
            Great speed
          • 5
            Fast development
          • 4
            It's fast
          • 4
            Easy to use
          • 4
            Isomorphic coolness
          • 3
            Great community
          • 3
            Not Python
          • 3
            Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
          • 3
            TypeScript Support
          • 3
            Blazing fast
          • 3
            Performant and fast prototyping
          • 3
            Easy to learn
          • 3
            Easy
          • 3
            Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
          • 3
            One language, end-to-end
          • 3
            Less boilerplate code
          • 2
            Npm i ape-updating
          • 2
            Event Driven
          • 2
            Lovely
          • 1
            Creat for apis
          • 0
            Node
          CONS OF NODE.JS
          • 46
            Bound to a single CPU
          • 45
            New framework every day
          • 40
            Lots of terrible examples on the internet
          • 33
            Asynchronous programming is the worst
          • 24
            Callback
          • 19
            Javascript
          • 11
            Dependency hell
          • 11
            Dependency based on GitHub
          • 10
            Low computational power
          • 7
            Very very Slow
          • 7
            Can block whole server easily
          • 7
            Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
          • 4
            Breaking updates
          • 4
            Unstable
          • 3
            Unneeded over complication
          • 3
            No standard approach
          • 1
            Bad transitive dependency management
          • 1
            Can't read server session

          related Node.js posts

          Anurag Maurya

          Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

          Hello community,

          I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

          I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

          Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

          I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

          For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

          1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

          2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

          3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

          See more
          HTML5 logo

          HTML5

          153.2K
          2.2K
          5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
          153.2K
          2.2K
          PROS OF HTML5
          • 448
            New doctype
          • 389
            Local storage
          • 334
            Canvas
          • 285
            Semantic header and footer
          • 240
            Video element
          • 121
            Geolocation
          • 106
            Form autofocus
          • 100
            Email inputs
          • 85
            Editable content
          • 79
            Application caches
          • 10
            Easy to use
          • 9
            Cleaner Code
          • 5
            Easy
          • 4
            Websockets
          • 4
            Semantical
          • 3
            Audio element
          • 3
            Content focused
          • 3
            Better
          • 3
            Modern
          • 2
            Compatible
          • 2
            Very easy to learning to HTML
          • 2
            Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
          • 2
            Portability
          CONS OF HTML5
          • 2
            Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
          • 1
            Long and winding code

          related HTML5 posts

          Shared insights
          on
          MySQLMySQLPHPPHPJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5

          Hey guys, I need some advice on one thing. Currently, I am a fresher and know HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, PHP and, MySQL. Recently I got a client project through one of my friends and he wants me to build an E-learning Management System. Are these skills enough to build an LMS website?

          Thanks in advance!! ;)

          See more
          Jan Vlnas
          Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 482.3K views
          Shared insights
          on
          HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

          Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

          See more
          PHP logo

          PHP

          146.4K
          4.6K
          A popular general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development
          146.4K
          4.6K
          PROS OF PHP
          • 954
            Large community
          • 820
            Open source
          • 767
            Easy deployment
          • 487
            Great frameworks
          • 387
            The best glue on the web
          • 235
            Continual improvements
          • 185
            Good old web
          • 145
            Web foundation
          • 135
            Community packages
          • 125
            Tool support
          • 35
            Used by wordpress
          • 34
            Excellent documentation
          • 29
            Used by Facebook
          • 23
            Because of Symfony
          • 21
            Dynamic Language
          • 17
            Easy to learn
          • 17
            Cheap hosting
          • 15
            Very powerful web language
          • 14
            Awesome Language and easy to implement
          • 14
            Fast development
          • 14
            Because of Laravel
          • 13
            Composer
          • 12
            Flexibility, syntax, extensibility
          • 9
            Easiest deployment
          • 8
            Readable Code
          • 8
            Fast
          • 7
            Most of the web uses it
          • 7
            Short development lead times
          • 7
            Worst popularity quality ratio
          • 7
            Fastestest Time to Version 1.0 Deployments
          • 6
            Faster then ever
          • 6
            Simple, flexible yet Scalable
          • 5
            Open source and large community
          • 4
            Easy to use and learn
          • 4
            Great developer experience
          • 4
            Has the best ecommerce(Magento,Prestashop,Opencart,etc)
          • 4
            Is like one zip of air
          • 4
            Open source and great framework
          • 4
            Large community, easy setup, easy deployment, framework
          • 4
            Cheap to own
          • 4
            Easy to learn, a big community, lot of frameworks
          • 4
            I have no choice :(
          • 2
            Hard not to use
          • 2
            Great flexibility. From fast prototyping to large apps
          • 2
            Interpreted at the run time
          • 2
            Walk away
          • 2
            FFI
          • 2
            Safe the planet
          • 2
            Used by STOMT
          • 2
            Fault tolerance
          • 1
            Simplesaml
          • 1
            Secure
          • 1
            It can get you a lamborghini
          • 1
            Bando
          • 0
            Secure
          • 0
            Largr community
          CONS OF PHP
          • 21
            So easy to learn, good practices are hard to find
          • 16
            Inconsistent API
          • 8
            Fragmented community
          • 6
            Not secure
          • 3
            No routing system
          • 3
            Hard to debug
          • 2
            Old

          related PHP posts

          Nick Rockwell
          SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.4M views

          When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

          So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

          React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

          Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

          See more

          Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

          I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

          I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

          See more