StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Hadoop vs InfluxDB

Hadoop vs InfluxDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hadoop
Hadoop
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.3K
Votes56
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks9.1K
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175

Hadoop vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Hadoop and InfluxDB, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Scalability: Hadoop is designed for distributed processing of large-scale data across a cluster of commodity hardware. It provides reliable and scalable storage and processing capabilities, making it suitable for big data applications. On the other hand, InfluxDB is primarily built for time-series data, offering high write and query performance for time-based data points. It is optimized for handling high-frequency data streams efficiently.

  2. Data Model: Hadoop follows a file-based storage model, where data is stored in the form of files and processed using the MapReduce framework. It is best suited for batch processing and long-running jobs. InfluxDB, on the other hand, uses a specialized time-series data model with a columnar store. It efficiently organizes and indexes time-stamped data, making it ideal for real-time analytics and monitoring applications.

  3. Query Language: Hadoop primarily utilizes MapReduce programming paradigm for data processing, which requires writing complex Map and Reduce functions in languages like Java or Python. InfluxDB, on the other hand, provides a high-level query language called InfluxQL. It simplifies working with time-series data by allowing users to perform common aggregation, filtering, and transformation operations directly using SQL-like syntax.

  4. Data Retention: Hadoop does not have built-in data retention policies and relies on external tools or manual management for data retention. InfluxDB, in contrast, offers built-in data retention policies that enable automatic deletion of old data based on specified criteria. This feature is particularly useful in time-series data scenarios where old data becomes less relevant as time progresses.

  5. Cluster Management: Hadoop requires additional tools like Apache ZooKeeper or Apache Ambari for cluster management and coordination. These tools help in managing cluster resources, monitoring and troubleshooting, and ensuring high availability. InfluxDB, being a standalone time-series database, does not require external tools for cluster management. It can easily be deployed as a single instance or in a highly available cluster using InfluxDB Enterprise.

  6. Secondary Indexing: Hadoop does not provide native support for secondary indexing, making it more challenging to efficiently retrieve specific data subsets from a large dataset. InfluxDB, on the other hand, offers robust support for secondary indexing, allowing users to efficiently query time-series data based on multiple dimensions or tags. This feature enhances the flexibility and performance of queries on large volumes of time-series data.

In Summary, Hadoop is a distributed processing framework designed for large-scale data processing, while InfluxDB is a specialized time-series database optimized for high-frequency time-stamped data. Hadoop uses a file-based storage model and requires complex programming for data processing, whereas InfluxDB utilizes a columnar store and provides a high-level query language for time-series data. InfluxDB offers built-in data retention and secondary indexing capabilities, simplifying management and enhancing query performance for time-series data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hadoop, InfluxDB

Deepak
Deepak

Sep 6, 2021

Needs adviceonJSONJSONInfluxDBInfluxDB

Hi all, I am trying to decide on a database for time-series data. The data could be tracking some simple series like statistics over time or could be a nested JSON (multi-level nested). I have been experimenting with InfluxDB for the former case of a simple list of variables over time. The continuous queries are powerful too. But for the latter case, where InfluxDB requires to flatten out a nested JSON before saving it into the database the complexity arises. The nested JSON could be objects or a list of objects and objects under objects in which a complete flattening doesn't leave the data in a state for the queries I'm thinking.

[ 
  { "timestamp": "2021-09-06T12:51:00Z",
    "name": "Name1",
    "books": [
        { "title": "Book1", "page": 100 },
        { "title": "Book2", "page": 280 },
    ]
  },
 { "timestamp": "2021-09-06T12:52:00Z",
   "name": "Name2",
   "books": [
       { "title": "Book1", "page": 320},
       { "title": "Book2", "page": 530 },
       { "title": "Book3", "page": 150 },
   ]
 }
]

Sample query: With a time range, for name xyz, find all the book title for which # of page < 400.

If I flatten it completely, it will result in fields like books_0_title, books_0_page, books_1_title, books_1_page, ... And by losing the nested context it will be hard to return one field (title) where some condition for another field (page) satisfies.

Appreciate any suggestions. Even a piece of generic advice on handling the time-series and choosing the database is welcome!

30.5k views30.5k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Mr
Mr

SVP CTO

Apr 22, 2021

Needs adviceonMarkLogicMarkLogicHadoopHadoopSnowflakeSnowflake

For a property and casualty insurance company, we currently use MarkLogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus Snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?

136k views136k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hadoop
Hadoop
InfluxDB
InfluxDB

The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

-
Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
2.3K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
56
Votes
175
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Amazon aws
  • 1
    Java syntax
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
  • 1
    Proprietary query language

What are some alternatives to Hadoop, InfluxDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase