StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. HBase vs HarperDB

HBase vs HarperDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
HarperDB
HarperDB
Stacks6
Followers18
Votes9

HBase vs HarperDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing HBase and HarperDB, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two databases. Both HBase and HarperDB offer different features and capabilities that cater to specific use cases and requirements.

  1. Data Model: HBase is a wide-column store NoSQL database that follows the column-family-based data model similar to Google Bigtable. On the other hand, HarperDB is a hybrid SQL/NoSQL database that leverages a hybrid data model combining the benefits of both relational and NoSQL databases. This allows HarperDB to support complex relational structures along with schema-less flexibility for semi-structured and unstructured data.

  2. Query Language: HBase utilizes the HBase Shell, which is primarily based on the Hadoop ecosystem and uses HBase-specific commands for querying and manipulating data. In contrast, HarperDB supports SQL for querying and managing data, making it more accessible and familiar to users with SQL knowledge. This simplifies the integration and querying process for developers and data analysts.

  3. Scaling Capabilities: HBase is built to scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the Hadoop cluster, allowing for distributed storage and processing of vast amounts of data. HarperDB, on the other hand, is designed to scale vertically by utilizing multi-threading and running on a single server or container, making it suitable for smaller to medium-sized applications that do not require massive horizontal scaling.

  4. Data Consistency: HBase offers strong consistency guarantees with the use of Row-level locks, which ensures that data is always consistent across all nodes in the cluster. HarperDB, on the other hand, provides eventual consistency by default but allows developers to configure strong consistency on a per-transaction basis, providing flexibility based on the application's requirements.

  5. Deployment: HBase is typically deployed on top of a Hadoop cluster, requiring the setup and maintenance of a distributed infrastructure for optimal performance. In contrast, HarperDB can be deployed as a standalone database or within a containerized environment, providing easier deployment options for applications with limited infrastructure resources or those looking for a more lightweight solution.

In Summary, HBase and HarperDB differ in their data model, query language, scaling capabilities, data consistency, and deployment options, catering to specific use cases and requirements of different applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
HarperDB
HarperDB

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

Harper takes the "stack" out of "tech stack" by combining data storage, caching, application, and messaging functions into a single technology to achieve unmatched global low latency, simplicity, and cost performance at scale.

-
Cloud; Edge Computing; On Prem; Globally Distributed; Custom Functions; Database-as-a-service; Hybrid Cloud; Clustering and Replication; Fully-Indexed; Dynamic Schema; Small Footprint; SQL Query Engine; Full NoSQL Capabilities; Configurable Table-Level Pub/Sub; Built In API with Single End Point; Role Based Security; User Friendly Management Studio; Industry Standard Interfaces & Drivers;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
511
Stacks
6
Followers
498
Followers
18
Votes
15
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
Pros
  • 2
    Data api
  • 1
    Cost efficient
  • 1
    Edge capabilities
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Integration
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
GraphQL
GraphQL
Docker
Docker
.NET
.NET
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
React.js Boilerplate
React.js Boilerplate
uWebSockets
uWebSockets
Python
Python
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to HBase, HarperDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase