StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Helidon vs Istio

Helidon vs Istio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Istio
Istio
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.5K
Votes54
GitHub Stars37.6K
Forks8.1K
Helidon
Helidon
Stacks14
Followers23
Votes1

Helidon vs Istio: What are the differences?

  1. Runtime Environment: Helidon is a lightweight Java microservices framework that provides a simple, functional and reactive programming model for building microservices. On the other hand, Istio is a service mesh platform that helps to connect, secure, and manage microservices. While Helidon focuses on providing a framework for developing microservices, Istio is more focused on managing the communication between microservices in a distributed system.

  2. Support for Microservices Communication: Helidon provides support for building microservices using Java programming language, but it does not provide built-in features for handling service-to-service communication, load balancing, and routing. Meanwhile, Istio offers advanced features for managing microservices communication such as traffic routing, load balancing, service discovery, and fault tolerance. Istio uses a data plane and control plane architecture to provide these features.

  3. Integration with Kubernetes: Helidon can be deployed and run on Kubernetes, but it does not offer built-in integration with Kubernetes features such as automatic scaling, rolling updates, and service discovery. In contrast, Istio is designed to work seamlessly with Kubernetes and complements its features by providing advanced networking, security, and monitoring capabilities for microservices running on Kubernetes clusters.

  4. Service Proxy: In Helidon, service-to-service communication is typically implemented using HTTP clients and servers within the microservices. In Istio, a sidecar proxy is deployed alongside each microservice instance to handle communication, routing, and monitoring at the network level. This proxy intercepts and controls all inbound and outbound traffic to the microservice, providing additional security and observability features.

  5. Traffic Management: Helidon does not include built-in tools for advanced traffic management such as A/B testing, canary deployments, and traffic shifting. In contrast, Istio provides powerful traffic management capabilities through its control plane, enabling developers to implement sophisticated deployment strategies and fine-grained routing rules without modifying application code.

  6. Security Features: Helidon offers basic security features such as TLS support and authentication mechanisms for securing microservices. On the other hand, Istio provides a robust set of security features including mutual TLS, access control policies, and encryption of service-to-service communication. Istio's security features are configurable and can be applied uniformly across all microservices in the mesh.

In Summary, Helidon is a lightweight Java microservices framework focused on building microservices, while Istio is a service mesh platform that specializes in managing microservices communication, integration with Kubernetes, service proxying, traffic management, and security features for microservices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Istio
Istio
Helidon
Helidon

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

It is a collection of Java libraries for writing microservices that run on a fast web core powered by Netty.

-
Reactive Microframework; Tiny Footprint; Functional Style; Simple and Transparent; GraalVM Native Image; MicroProfile; Small Footprint; Declarative Style; Dependency Injection
Statistics
GitHub Stars
37.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
14
Followers
1.5K
Followers
23
Votes
54
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Powerful authorization mechanisms
  • 5
    Ingress controller
Cons
  • 17
    Performance
Pros
  • 1
    Light weight and fast
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Java
Java
Netty
Netty
OpenAPI
OpenAPI
OpenTracing
OpenTracing
Jaeger
Jaeger
Jersey
Jersey
Prometheus
Prometheus
Zipkin
Zipkin
GraalVM
GraalVM

What are some alternatives to Istio, Helidon?

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana