HERE Geocoding vs OSRM

Overview

OSRM

Stacks34

Followers85

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.2K

Forks3.8K

HERE Geocoding

Stacks6

Followers17

Votes0

HERE Geocoding vs OSRM: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Data Coverage: HERE Geocoding covers a wider range of countries globally compared to OSRM, which is more focused on European countries. This difference makes a significant impact on the accuracy of geocoding results depending on the region being accessed.
API Rate Limits: Regarding API rate limits, HERE Geocoding typically offers more generous limits for free usage compared to OSRM, which may have more restricted access for high-volume usage. This distinction can affect the scalability and accessibility of applications utilizing geocoding services.
Customization Options: HERE Geocoding provides more comprehensive customization options for developers, allowing them to tailor geocoding queries based on specific parameters and requirements. In contrast, OSRM may have more predefined settings that limit the extent of customization available to users.
Support for Reverse Geocoding: While both services support geocoding, HERE Geocoding has a more robust system for reverse geocoding capabilities, allowing users to obtain address information based on geographical coordinates. OSRM may have limited or different functionalities in this regard.
Real-time Traffic Data: HERE Geocoding integrates real-time traffic data into its geocoding results, which can be valuable for applications requiring up-to-date traffic information. In contrast, OSRM may not incorporate real-time traffic data, affecting the accuracy and relevance of geocoding results in dynamic traffic conditions.
Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of HERE Geocoding and OSRM differs in terms of subscription models, usage fees, and additional costs for certain features. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations selecting a geocoding service that aligns with their budget and specific needs.

In Summary, the key differences between HERE Geocoding and OSRM lie in data coverage, API rate limits, customization options, support for reverse geocoding, real-time traffic data integration, and pricing structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OSRM	HERE Geocoding
It is a C++ implementation of a high-performance routing engine for shortest paths in road networks	It provides comprehensive coverage in 196 countries and a number of territories with high-precision mapping of geo-coordinates and addresses. It enables the optimization and processing of high volumes of data, and enables the multi-reverse geocoding of hundreds of coordinates in one request or batch geocoding of hundreds of addresses through single file uploads.
Flexible import of OpenStreetMap data; Handles continental sized networks within milliseconds; Supports car, bicycle, walk modes; easily customized through profiles	Accuracy that boosts efficiency; Gain highly relevant results; Spot opportunities, trends and patterns; Work with high volumes of data easily
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 34	Stacks 6
Followers 85	Followers 17
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
C++ GitHub JavaScript	JavaScript iOS Android OS

What are some alternatives to OSRM, HERE Geocoding?

Google Maps

Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow.

Mapbox

We make it possible to pin travel spots on Pinterest, find restaurants on Foursquare, and visualize data on GitHub.

Leaflet

Leaflet is an open source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps. It is developed by Vladimir Agafonkin of MapBox with a team of dedicated contributors. Weighing just about 30 KB of gzipped JS code, it has all the features most developers ever need for online maps.

OpenStreetMap

OpenStreetMap is built by a community of mappers that contribute and maintain data about roads, trails, cafés, railway stations, and much more, all over the world.

OpenLayers

An opensource javascript library to load, display and render maps from multiple sources on web pages.

ArcGIS

It is a geographic information system for working with maps and geographic information. It is used for creating and using maps, compiling geographic data, analyzing mapped information, sharing and much more.

CSV2GEO

It provides live conversion of batch addresses into geographic coordinates (address to lat long) or turn coordinates into well formatted address. It creates and publishes interactive maps.

MapTiler

It is a software for map tile rendering. It has been designed for producing seamless maps and aerial photo layers covering whole countries. The rendering is fast and efficient, and it can fully utilize multiple CPUs to 100%.

MAPS.ME

MAPS.ME is an open source cross-platform offline maps application, built on top of crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data. It was publicly released for iOS and Android.

LocationIQ

Free and Fast Geocoding Service

Related Comparisons

HERE Geocoding vs OSRM: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Data Coverage: HERE Geocoding covers a wider range of countries globally compared to OSRM, which is more focused on European countries. This difference makes a significant impact on the accuracy of geocoding results depending on the region being accessed.
API Rate Limits: Regarding API rate limits, HERE Geocoding typically offers more generous limits for free usage compared to OSRM, which may have more restricted access for high-volume usage. This distinction can affect the scalability and accessibility of applications utilizing geocoding services.
Customization Options: HERE Geocoding provides more comprehensive customization options for developers, allowing them to tailor geocoding queries based on specific parameters and requirements. In contrast, OSRM may have more predefined settings that limit the extent of customization available to users.
Support for Reverse Geocoding: While both services support geocoding, HERE Geocoding has a more robust system for reverse geocoding capabilities, allowing users to obtain address information based on geographical coordinates. OSRM may have limited or different functionalities in this regard.
Real-time Traffic Data: HERE Geocoding integrates real-time traffic data into its geocoding results, which can be valuable for applications requiring up-to-date traffic information. In contrast, OSRM may not incorporate real-time traffic data, affecting the accuracy and relevance of geocoding results in dynamic traffic conditions.
Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of HERE Geocoding and OSRM differs in terms of subscription models, usage fees, and additional costs for certain features. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations selecting a geocoding service that aligns with their budget and specific needs.

HERE Geocoding vs OSRM

Overview