StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. HPE Nimble Storage vs Tardigrade

HPE Nimble Storage vs Tardigrade

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tardigrade
Tardigrade
Stacks1
Followers16
Votes0
HPE Nimble Storage
HPE Nimble Storage
Stacks7
Followers6
Votes0

HPE Nimble Storage vs Tardigrade: What are the differences?

## Introduction 
When comparing HPE Nimble Storage and Tardigrade, it's essential to consider the key differences between the two in terms of features, performance, and reliability. 

1. **Data Redundancy**: One key difference between HPE Nimble Storage and Tardigrade is in their approach to data redundancy. HPE Nimble Storage uses features like triple+ parity RAID schemes to protect data, while Tardigrade utilizes decentralized cloud-based storage with its built-in redundancy mechanisms like erasure coding.

2. **Storage Model**: HPE Nimble Storage follows a traditional centralized storage model, where all data is stored in a centralized location, whereas Tardigrade uses a decentralized storage model, where data is distributed across multiple nodes globally, ensuring higher data availability and durability.

3. **Pricing Structure**: HPE Nimble Storage operates on a traditional subscription-based pricing model, where users pay based on capacity and features required, while Tardigrade offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the actual storage and bandwidth they use, making it more cost-effective for smaller workloads.

4. **Integration with Blockchain**: Tardigrade stands out by offering integration with blockchain technology, providing immutable and secure data storage through its decentralized architecture, which can be beneficial for industries requiring high levels of data integrity and security.

5. **Network Performance**: HPE Nimble Storage is designed for high-performance enterprise-grade storage solutions, optimized for low-latency access and high throughput, while Tardigrade's decentralized network may offer lower latency in some cases due to its distributed nature but may have varying network performance based on the geographical distribution of nodes.

6. **Data Privacy and Security**: Both HPE Nimble Storage and Tardigrade prioritize data privacy and security, but Tardigrade's decentralized storage model inherently provides higher data privacy as user data is encrypted, sharded, and distributed across the network, reducing the risk of centralized data breaches compared to traditional storage solutions like HPE Nimble Storage.

## In Summary, 
The key differences between HPE Nimble Storage and Tardigrade lie in their data redundancy mechanisms, storage models, pricing structures, integration with blockchain, network performance, and approach to data privacy and security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tardigrade
Tardigrade
HPE Nimble Storage
HPE Nimble Storage

It is the enterprise, production-ready version of storjproject's decentralized cloud storage network. Ridiculously resilient, highly distributed. It is the perfect alternative to Amazon S3 -- in fact, it's S3 compatible so you can build your product using it as your backend storage layer without any issues.

It is an intelligent, self-managing storage that frees you to innovate for your business.

S3-Compatible & Lightyears Ahead; Secure by Default; Globally Distributed; Built with Developers in Mind
Power business-critical apps; Deliver the cloud experience; Power business-critical apps; Eliminate application disruptions
Statistics
Stacks
1
Stacks
7
Followers
16
Followers
6
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Swift
Swift
C#
C#
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Xamarin
Xamarin
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Tardigrade, HPE Nimble Storage?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase