StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Hydra Framework vs Spring Batch

Hydra Framework vs Spring Batch

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Batch
Spring Batch
Stacks184
Followers250
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks2.5K
Hydra Framework
Hydra Framework
Stacks14
Followers48
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks723

Spring Batch vs Hydra Framework: What are the differences?

Developers describe Spring Batch as "A lightweight, comprehensive batch framework". It is designed to enable the development of robust batch applications vital for the daily operations of enterprise systems It also provides reusable functions that are essential in processing large volumes of records, including logging/tracing, transaction management, job processing statistics, job restart, skip, and resource management.. On the other hand, Hydra Framework is detailed as "A framework that simplifies development of complex applications (by Facebook)". It is a framework for elegantly configuring complex applications. It has the ability to run multiple similar jobs.

Spring Batch and Hydra Framework can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Some of the features offered by Spring Batch are:

  • Transaction management
  • Chunk based processing
  • Declarative I/O

On the other hand, Hydra Framework provides the following key features:

  • Hierarchical configuration composable from multiple sources
  • Configuration can be specified or overridden from the command line
  • Dynamic command line tab completion

Spring Batch and Hydra Framework are both open source tools. It seems that Spring Batch with 1.38K GitHub stars and 1.39K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Hydra Framework with 1.17K GitHub stars and 50 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spring Batch
Spring Batch
Hydra Framework
Hydra Framework

It is designed to enable the development of robust batch applications vital for the daily operations of enterprise systems. It also provides reusable functions that are essential in processing large volumes of records, including logging/tracing, transaction management, job processing statistics, job restart, skip, and resource management.

A Python framework that simplifies the development of complex applications

Transaction management; Chunk based processing; Declarative I/O
Hierarchical configuration composable from multiple sources; Configuration can be specified or overridden from the command line; Dynamic command line tab completion; Run your application locally or launch it to run remotely; Run multiple jobs with different arguments with a single command
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
723
Stacks
184
Stacks
14
Followers
250
Followers
48
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Override everything in your config from the command lin
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Compose your config from the command line
  • 1
    Automatic working directory per run
  • 1
    Automatic logging configuration
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
MongoDB
MongoDB
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Spring Batch, Hydra Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase