StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. InfluxDB vs Microsoft SQL Server

InfluxDB vs Microsoft SQL Server

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Stacks21.3K
Followers15.5K
Votes540
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175

InfluxDB vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?

Introduction

InfluxDB and Microsoft SQL Server are two popular databases used in different scenarios. They have some key differences that set them apart. Let's explore these differences:

  1. Data Model: InfluxDB has a time series data model, which is optimized for storing and querying time-stamped data. It organizes data based on timestamps, allowing efficient storage and retrieval of time-series data. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server has a relational data model, which is optimized for storing structured data in tables with predefined schemas. It supports complex relationships and joins between tables.

  2. Query Language: InfluxDB uses its own query language called InfluxQL, which is specifically designed for time series data. It provides functions and operators that are tailored for working with time-series data. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server uses Transact-SQL (T-SQL), a standard SQL language with additional extensions and features for managing relational databases.

  3. Scalability: InfluxDB is designed to handle high write and query loads for time-series data. It can horizontally scale by adding more nodes to a cluster, allowing it to handle large amounts of data and high concurrency. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server can also scale horizontally by using database sharding or replication, but it may require more complex setup and configuration compared to InfluxDB.

  4. Data retention: InfluxDB provides built-in data retention policies that allow automatic deletion of old data based on specified criteria. This feature is particularly useful for managing time-series data, where old data becomes less relevant over time. Microsoft SQL Server does not have built-in data retention policies, so data management needs to be manually implemented.

  5. Data integrity: Microsoft SQL Server has support for enforcing data integrity through constraints, such as primary key, unique key, and foreign key constraints. These constraints ensure the correctness and consistency of the data. InfluxDB, being a time series database, does not have built-in support for constraints like primary key or foreign key relationships.

  6. Optimization techniques: InfluxDB provides various optimization techniques for efficient storage and query performance, such as compression and indexing on the time series data. It also supports downsampling, which allows aggregating data over time intervals to reduce storage requirements. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server provides advanced indexing techniques, query optimization, and caching mechanisms for efficient query performance on relational data.

In Summary, InfluxDB and Microsoft SQL Server have key differences in their data models, query languages, scalability, data retention, data integrity, and optimization techniques.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft SQL Server, InfluxDB

Erin
Erin

IT Specialist

Mar 10, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL ServerMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

  1. I need to use either @{MySQL}|tool:1025| or @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| on a @{Linux}|tool:10483| based OS. Which would be better for this application?
  2. I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
668k views668k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
InfluxDB
InfluxDB

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

-
Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Statistics
Stacks
21.3K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
15.5K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
540
Votes
175
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Reliable and easy to use
  • 101
    High performance
  • 95
    Great with .net
  • 65
    Works well with .net
  • 56
    Easy to maintain
Cons
  • 4
    Expensive Licensing
  • 2
    Microsoft
  • 1
    Replication can loose the data
  • 1
    Allwayon can loose data in asycronious mode
  • 1
    Data pages is only 8k
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
  • 1
    Proprietary query language

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server, InfluxDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

CouchDB

CouchDB

Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase