StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. InfluxDB vs SQLite

InfluxDB vs SQLite

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SQLite
SQLite
Stacks19.9K
Followers15.2K
Votes535
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175

InfluxDB vs SQLite: What are the differences?

Introduction

InfluxDB and SQLite are both popular database management systems that have their own unique features and capabilities. Below are the key differences between InfluxDB and SQLite:

  1. Data Structure: InfluxDB is a time-series database specifically designed for handling time-stamped or time series data, making it ideal for storing metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It organizes data into "measurements," which consist of tags, fields, and a timestamp. On the other hand, SQLite is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that supports a wide range of data types and can handle general-purpose data with complex relationships.

  2. Concurrency: InfluxDB is optimized for high write and read performance, especially for large-scale time-series data. It can handle a massive number of simultaneous write and read operations, making it suitable for real-time data ingestion and analysis. In contrast, SQLite is not designed for high concurrency scenarios and can struggle with multiple concurrent write operations. It performs best in single-user or low-concurrency applications.

  3. SQL Support: SQLite has full SQL support and adheres to the SQL 92 standard. It provides a comprehensive set of SQL features, including advanced querying capabilities, joins, views, and transaction support. InfluxDB, on the other hand, incorporates a subset of SQL-like querying language called InfluxQL, which is tailored to handle time-series data efficiently. InfluxQL provides specific functions and aggregation methods optimized for time series analysis.

  4. Scalability: InfluxDB is a horizontally scalable database, meaning it can scale by adding more servers to a cluster to handle increased data volume and user load. It supports automatic data sharding and distribution across multiple nodes, allowing for seamless scalability. SQLite, however, is primarily designed for small to medium-sized applications and does not provide built-in support for horizontal scalability.

  5. Storage: InfluxDB uses a custom storage engine called TSM (Time Structured Merge Tree), which is optimized for high-performance storage and retrieval of time-series data. It compresses and indexes data in a way that allows for efficient querying based on time intervals. On the other hand, SQLite stores data in a traditional file-based format, where each database is stored as a single file on disk. While SQLite offers good performance for small to medium-sized datasets, it may not be as efficient as InfluxDB for large-scale time-series data.

  6. Use Cases: InfluxDB is commonly used in applications that handle large amounts of time-stamped data, such as monitoring systems, IoT platforms, and real-time analytics. Its high write and read performance, along with built-in time series analysis functions, make it well-suited for these use cases. SQLite, on the other hand, is often used in embedded systems, mobile applications, and small-scale web applications where simplicity, ease of use, and low resource requirements are important factors.

In Summary, InfluxDB is a time-series database designed for high-performance storage and analysis of time-stamped data, with excellent scalability and SQL-like querying language specifically optimized for time series analysis. SQLite, on the other hand, is a general-purpose relational database management system that provides full SQL support, good performance for small to medium-sized datasets, and is commonly used in embedded systems and mobile applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SQLite, InfluxDB

Dimelo
Dimelo

Nov 5, 2020

Needs adviceonSQLiteSQLiteMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I need to add a DBMS to my stack, but I don't know which. I'm tempted to learn SQLite since it would be useful to me with its focus on local access without concurrency. However, doing so feels like I would be defeating the purpose of trying to expand my skill set since it seems like most enterprise applications have the opposite requirements.

To be able to apply what I learn to more projects, what should I try to learn? MySQL? PostgreSQL? Something else? Is there a comfortable middle ground between high applicability and ease of use?

670k views670k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Stephen
Stephen

Senior DevOps Engineer at Vital Beats

Nov 9, 2020

Review

A question you might want to think about is "What kind of experience do I want to gain, by using a DBMS?". If your aim is to have experience with SQL and any related libraries and frameworks for your language of choice (python, I think?), then it kind of doesn't matter too much which you pick so much. As others have said, SQLite would offer you the ability to very easily get started, and would give you a reasonably standard (if a little basic) SQL dialect to work with.

If your aim is actually to have a bit of "operational" experience, in terms of things like what command line tools might be available as standard for the DBMS, understanding how the DBMS handles multiple databases, when to use multiple schemas vs multiple databases, some basic privilege management etc. Then I would recommend PostgreSQL. SQLite's simplicity actually avoids most of these experiences, which is not helpful to you if that is what you hope to learn. MySQL has a few "quirks" to how it manages things like multiple databases, which may lead you to making less good decisions if you tried to take your experience over to different DBMS, especially in bigger enterprise roles. PostgreSQL is kind of a happy middle ground here, with the ability to start PostgreSQL servers via docker or docker-compose making the actual day-to-day management pretty easy, while still giving you experience of the kinds of considerations I have listed above.

At Vital Beats we make use of PostgreSQL, largely because it offers us a happy balance between good management and backup of data, and good standard command line tools, which is essential for us where we are deploying our solutions within Kubernetes / docker, and so more graphical tools are not always appropriate for us. PostgreSQL is also pretty universally supported in terms of language libraries and frameworks, without having to make compromises on how we want to store and layout our data.

316k views316k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SQLite
SQLite
InfluxDB
InfluxDB

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

-
Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Statistics
Stacks
19.9K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
15.2K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
535
Votes
175
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 163
    Lightweight
  • 135
    Portable
  • 122
    Simple
  • 81
    Sql
  • 29
    Preinstalled on iOS and Android
Cons
  • 2
    Not for multi-process of multithreaded apps
  • 1
    Needs different binaries for each platform
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
  • 1
    Proprietary query language

What are some alternatives to SQLite, InfluxDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

CouchDB

CouchDB

Apache CouchDB is a database that uses JSON for documents, JavaScript for MapReduce indexes, and regular HTTP for its API. CouchDB is a database that completely embraces the web. Store your data with JSON documents. Access your documents and query your indexes with your web browser, via HTTP. Index, combine, and transform your documents with JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase