StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Iris vs Next.js

Iris vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Iris
Iris
Stacks84
Followers130
Votes16
GitHub Stars25.6K
Forks2.5K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Iris vs Next.js: What are the differences?

  1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR): The key difference between Iris and Next.js is that Iris is a lightweight web framework for Go that does not support server-side rendering out-of-the-box, while Next.js, a React framework, excels in server-side rendering, making it easier to optimize for search engines.
  2. Language and Ecosystem: Iris is built for the Go programming language, which offers a different ecosystem and tools compared to Next.js, which is built for JavaScript and follows the Node.js ecosystem.
  3. Learning Curve: Iris, being a web framework for Go, aligns with the programming paradigms of Go, which may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with the language, whereas Next.js, being based on React, might be more accessible to front-end developers.
  4. Community Support: Next.js benefits from a large and active community due to its popular usage in the React ecosystem, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support, whereas Iris, being less widely adopted, may have a smaller community base.
  5. APIs and Data Fetching: Next.js provides robust support for data fetching with its built-in functions like getServerSideProps and getStaticProps for server-side rendering and static site generation, respectively, while Iris may require more manual setup for complex data fetching requirements.
  6. Project Scalability: Next.js, being heavily utilized in large-scale web applications, provides built-in features and optimizations for scalability, such as incremental static regeneration, which may make it more suitable for large, dynamic projects compared to Iris.

In Summary, Iris and Next.js differ in server-side rendering, language and ecosystem, learning curve, community support, data fetching capabilities, and project scalability, catering to various needs and preferences in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Iris, Next.js

Yucen
Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k
Comments
Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Iris
Iris
Next.js
Next.js

The fastest web framework for Go.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

-
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
25.6K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
84
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
130
Followers
5.1K
Votes
16
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Almost real-time support to its users
  • 2
    Fluent API
  • 1
    MVC efficient
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Golang
Golang
React
React

What are some alternatives to Iris, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase