StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Isotope vs Vanilla.JS

Isotope vs Vanilla.JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Isotope
Isotope
Stacks57
Followers21
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.1K
Forks1.4K
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9

Isotope vs Vanilla.JS: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this markdown, we will compare the key differences between Isotope and Vanilla.JS.

1. **Performance**: Isotope is specifically optimized for handling filtering and sorting of DOM elements, resulting in better performance compared to Vanilla.JS for these tasks.
   
2. **Ease of Use**: Vanilla.JS requires manual coding for filtering and sorting functionality while Isotope provides a ready-to-use solution out of the box, making it easier to implement complex layouts.
   
3. **Flexibility**: Isotope offers more flexibility in terms of customization and layout options, allowing for more creative and dynamic designs compared to the more rigid structure of Vanilla.JS.
   
4. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Vanilla.JS has a wide range of plugins available for various functionalities beyond filtering and sorting, while Isotope focuses primarily on layout-related features.
   
5. **Community Support**: Vanilla.JS has a larger and more diverse community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, providing a wider range of resources and support compared to Isotope.
   
6. **Learning Curve**: Isotope may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its specialized focus on layout functionalities, while Vanilla.JS is more widely used and understood, making it easier to find resources and assistance. 

# Summary
In summary, Isotope excels in performance and layout customization, while Vanilla.JS offers broader functionality and stronger community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Isotope
Isotope
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS

It is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to sort, filter, and add Masonry layouts to items on a webpage

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

Dynamic sorting; Filtering of content right in the browser
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57
Stacks
82
Followers
21
Followers
85
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    NO CONVENTIONS
  • 1
    Unopinionated
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
WordPress
WordPress
HTML5
HTML5
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Isotope, Vanilla.JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase