Javalin vs LoopBack

Overview

LoopBack

Stacks285

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

Javalin

Stacks30

Followers64

Votes3

Javalin vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between Javalin and LoopBack.

Design Philosophy: Javalin is a lightweight web framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, LoopBack is a more comprehensive framework that provides a lot of built-in features and tools, making it suitable for large-scale applications with complex requirements.
Programming Language: Javalin is specifically designed for Java programming language users, providing a seamless experience for Java developers. In contrast, LoopBack is built on top of Node.js, making it a popular choice for JavaScript developers looking to create APIs and applications.
Community Support: Javalin has a smaller but dedicated community compared to LoopBack, which has a larger and well-established community. This can impact the availability of resources, tutorials, and third-party plugins that can enhance the development experience for users of the frameworks.
Learning Curve: Javalin's simplistic design and straightforward documentation make it easy for beginners to pick up and start building applications quickly. LoopBack, with its extensive feature set and more complex architecture, has a steeper learning curve, requiring more time and effort to fully grasp its capabilities.
Flexibility and Customization: Javalin offers a flexible and minimalist approach, allowing developers to have more control over their application architecture and design decisions. In contrast, LoopBack provides a more opinionated structure and comes with predefined patterns and conventions, limiting the degree of customization available to developers.
Scalability: LoopBack is known for its scalability and high-performance capabilities, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications that require robust performance and reliability. Javalin, while capable of handling moderate traffic and workload, may face challenges in scaling to meet the demands of larger, more complex projects.

In Summary, Javalin and LoopBack differ in design philosophy, programming language, community support, learning curve, flexibility, and scalability, catering to different needs and preferences of developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on LoopBack, Javalin

Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack	Javalin
A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.	Javalin started as a fork of the Spark framework but quickly turned into a ground-up rewrite influenced by express.js. Both of these web frameworks are inspired by the modern micro web framework grandfather: Sinatra, so if you’re coming from Ruby then Javalin shouldn’t feel too unfamiliar.
A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 285	Stacks 30
Followers 556	Followers 64
Votes 33	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility	Pros 1 Lightweight 1 Does not require IDEA plugins 1 Rich support of template engines
Integrations
Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS StrongLoop GraphQL	Kotlin Java

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Javalin?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Javalin vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between Javalin and LoopBack.

Design Philosophy: Javalin is a lightweight web framework that focuses on simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, LoopBack is a more comprehensive framework that provides a lot of built-in features and tools, making it suitable for large-scale applications with complex requirements.
Programming Language: Javalin is specifically designed for Java programming language users, providing a seamless experience for Java developers. In contrast, LoopBack is built on top of Node.js, making it a popular choice for JavaScript developers looking to create APIs and applications.
Community Support: Javalin has a smaller but dedicated community compared to LoopBack, which has a larger and well-established community. This can impact the availability of resources, tutorials, and third-party plugins that can enhance the development experience for users of the frameworks.
Learning Curve: Javalin's simplistic design and straightforward documentation make it easy for beginners to pick up and start building applications quickly. LoopBack, with its extensive feature set and more complex architecture, has a steeper learning curve, requiring more time and effort to fully grasp its capabilities.
Flexibility and Customization: Javalin offers a flexible and minimalist approach, allowing developers to have more control over their application architecture and design decisions. In contrast, LoopBack provides a more opinionated structure and comes with predefined patterns and conventions, limiting the degree of customization available to developers.
Scalability: LoopBack is known for its scalability and high-performance capabilities, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications that require robust performance and reliability. Javalin, while capable of handling moderate traffic and workload, may face challenges in scaling to meet the demands of larger, more complex projects.

Javalin vs LoopBack

Overview

Javalin vs LoopBack: What are the differences?