StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Javalin vs Nameko

Javalin vs Nameko

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468
Javalin
Javalin
Stacks30
Followers64
Votes3

Javalin vs Nameko: What are the differences?

<Java and Nameko are both frameworks used for web development, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here are the main distinguishing factors between Javalin and Nameko.>

1. **Architecture**: Javalin follows a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, allowing for separation of concerns between data, presentation, and logic. Meanwhile, Nameko is designed specifically for microservices architecture, emphasizing scalability and distributed systems.
2. **Language**: Javalin is written in Java, making it a suitable choice for developers familiar with the Java ecosystem. On the other hand, Nameko is implemented in Python, providing a more concise and expressive syntax for rapid development.
3. **Flexibility**: Javalin is more flexible in terms of configuration and customization, allowing developers to adapt the framework to their specific needs easily. In contrast, Nameko provides a more opinionated approach, offering predefined patterns and structures for building microservices.
4. **Community Support**: Javalin has a growing community of developers contributing to the framework and providing resources for troubleshooting and learning. Nameko, while effective for microservices, has a smaller community base, which may limit available support and resources.
5. **Integration**: Javalin has strong integration capabilities with Java-based tools and libraries, enabling seamless incorporation of existing Java projects. Nameko, being Python-based, integrates well with Python libraries and tools, fostering compatibility within the Python ecosystem.
6. **Scalability**: Javalin is well-suited for building scalable web applications, with features that support horizontal and vertical scaling. Conversely, Nameko's primary focus on microservices architecture inherently promotes scalability through independent, interconnected services.

In Summary, Javalin and Nameko differ in architecture, language, flexibility, community support, integration, and scalability, catering to distinct preferences and requirements in web development and microservices. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nameko, Javalin

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments
Juan José
Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

  • Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
  • I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
  • Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nameko
Nameko
Javalin
Javalin

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

Javalin started as a fork of the Spark framework but quickly turned into a ground-up rewrite influenced by express.js. Both of these web frameworks are inspired by the modern micro web framework grandfather: Sinatra, so if you’re coming from Ruby then Javalin shouldn’t feel too unfamiliar.

Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
468
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
20
Stacks
30
Followers
79
Followers
64
Votes
0
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Does not require IDEA plugins
  • 1
    Rich support of template engines
  • 1
    Lightweight
Integrations
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Nameko, Javalin?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot