StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. JFrog Artifactory vs TortoiseSVN

JFrog Artifactory vs TortoiseSVN

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TortoiseSVN
TortoiseSVN
Stacks54
Followers117
Votes3
GitHub Stars43
Forks30
JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Stacks342
Followers374
Votes0

JFrog Artifactory vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Key Differences between JFrog Artifactory and TortoiseSVN

JFrog Artifactory and TortoiseSVN are both widely used tools in software development and version control. While they have similar functionalities, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Repository Manager vs Version Control System: JFrog Artifactory is primarily a repository manager, designed to store and manage various types of artifacts and dependencies, including binary files, Docker containers, and packages. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a version control system (VCS), specifically designed to manage the source code of software projects, enabling version control and collaboration among developers.

  2. Centralized vs Distributed: Artifactory follows a centralized model, where all artifacts are stored in a central repository, and users retrieve them when needed. It allows for big releases and easy integration with build tools. TortoiseSVN, however, follows a distributed model, where each developer has a complete copy of the source code repository locally, enabling faster commits and better offline access.

  3. Branching and Merging: JFrog Artifactory does not support branching and merging natively, as it is not a version control system. It treats each artifact as an independent entity without considering the relationships between them. TortoiseSVN, being a version control system, provides robust branching and merging capabilities, allowing multiple developers to work on different branches and merge them back to the main codebase seamlessly.

  4. User Interface and Integration: Artifactory offers a web-based user interface that provides a visually appealing and intuitive experience for managing artifacts and dependencies. It integrates well with various build tools and CI/CD pipelines. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is an extension for Windows Explorer, providing a familiar and integrated interface for version control operations directly within the file system.

  5. Support for Different Programming Languages: JFrog Artifactory supports a wide array of programming languages, build tools, and package managers, making it suitable for managing artifacts in diverse software ecosystems. TortoiseSVN, while primarily focused on managing source code, supports multiple programming languages and can be used for version control in various software projects.

  6. Workflow and Collaboration: Artifactory focuses on artifact management and distribution, allowing teams to automate the build, test, and deployment processes. It provides features like permissions management and access control for collaborative working. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is designed for code collaboration, providing features like annotations, blame tracking, and code review integration, facilitating the collaboration and communication between developers.

In summary, JFrog Artifactory is a repository manager primarily focused on artifact management and distribution, while TortoiseSVN is a version control system designed for managing source code and enabling collaboration among developers. Artifactory follows a centralized model, lacks branching and merging capabilities, offers a web-based interface and supports multiple programming languages. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, follows a distributed model, provides robust branching and merging capabilities, integrates with the file system, supports multiple programming languages, and focuses on code collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TortoiseSVN, JFrog Artifactory

tutulbuet
tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaGitHubGitHubJFrog ArtifactoryJFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TortoiseSVN
TortoiseSVN
JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory

It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
43
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
30
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
54
Stacks
342
Followers
117
Followers
374
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Debian
Debian
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to TortoiseSVN, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana