StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Kendo UI vs jQWidgets

Kendo UI vs jQWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Kendo UI vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Kendo UI and jQWidgets

Kendo UI is a commercial JavaScript UI library developed by Telerik, known for its rich set of UI components that are visually appealing and easy to use. On the other hand, jQWidgets is an open-source jQuery plugin that offers a wide range of responsive web widgets for building modern web applications.

1. **Price**: One of the major differences between Kendo UI and jQWidgets is the pricing model. Kendo UI is a commercial product that requires a license fee for usage, while jQWidgets is open-source and free to use for both personal and commercial projects.

2. **Component Variety**: Kendo UI offers a larger selection of components compared to jQWidgets. Kendo UI includes advanced widgets like charts, grids, and editors, along with a comprehensive set of themes, whereas jQWidgets focuses more on basic UI widgets such as buttons, dropdowns, and input fields.

3. **Support and Documentation**: Kendo UI provides extensive documentation, official support channels, and regular updates, making it easier for developers to troubleshoot issues and stay updated with the latest features. In contrast, jQWidgets has limited official documentation and community support, which can be a drawback for developers seeking assistance.

4. **Customization and Theming**: Kendo UI offers robust customization options and a ThemeBuilder tool that allows developers to create custom themes effortlessly. In comparison, jQWidgets provides limited theming capabilities and lacks a dedicated tool for theme customization, making it less flexible in terms of visual customization.

5. **Performance and Optimization**: Kendo UI is known for its high performance and optimized codebase, resulting in faster loading times and smoother user experience. jQWidgets, while functional, may not offer the same level of performance optimization, especially when dealing with complex data sets or intensive UI interactions.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Kendo UI has a large community of users and developers, along with a thriving ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions that enhance its functionality. jQWidgets, due to its smaller user base, may have fewer community-contributed resources and integrations available, which can impact the ease of development and maintenance.

In Summary, Kendo UI and jQWidgets differ in terms of pricing, component variety, support and documentation, customization capabilities, performance optimization, and community ecosystem, catering to different needs and preferences in the realm of JavaScript UI libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kendo UI
Kendo UI
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
297
Stacks
14
Followers
359
Followers
49
Votes
33
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Spotty Documentation
  • 1
    Poor customizability
  • 1
    Awdawd
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Kendo UI, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase