StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs jQWidgets

React vs jQWidgets

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
jQWidgets
jQWidgets
Stacks14
Followers49
Votes1
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

React vs jQWidgets: What are the differences?

Key Differences between React and jQWidgets

<React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, while jQWidgets is a set of UI widgets for web applications. They have distinct differences that cater to different needs and preferences.>

  1. Component-Based vs. Widget-Based: React follows a component-based architecture where UIs are broken down into reusable components, enhancing code reusability and maintainability. On the other hand, jQWidgets operates on a widget-based approach where pre-designed UI elements can be added to web pages directly.

  2. Virtual DOM vs. DOM Manipulation: React uses a virtual DOM to optimize and update the actual DOM efficiently, resulting in better performance by reducing browser rendering time. In contrast, jQWidgets directly manipulates the DOM, which can impact performance, especially in complex web applications.

  3. State Management: React provides a robust state management system that enables components to manage their own state. This not only simplifies data flow but also improves the overall application architecture. jQWidgets, while offering some level of state management, may not be as comprehensive as React's state system.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: React has a larger and more active community with extensive resources, such as libraries and frameworks, making it easier for developers to find solutions and support. On the other hand, jQWidgets, although widely used, may have a smaller community and ecosystem, limiting the availability of resources and updates.

  5. Learning Curve: React may have a steeper learning curve compared to jQWidgets, especially for beginners due to its unique concepts like JSX and virtual DOM. In contrast, jQWidgets, with its more traditional approach to web development, could be easier to grasp for those familiar with jQuery or other JavaScript libraries.

  6. Performance Optimization: React comes with built-in tools and features that optimize performance, such as code splitting, lazy loading, and server-side rendering. jQWidgets, while offering performance enhancements, may not provide the same level of optimization out of the box as React does.

In Summary, React and jQWidgets differ in their architecture, state management, community support, learning curve, and performance optimization, catering to various development needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, jQWidgets

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
jQWidgets
jQWidgets

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Works Across Devices & Browsers; Web Standards Compliant; Optimized for Performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
14
Followers
147.0K
Followers
49
Votes
4.1K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 1
    Awd
Cons
  • 1
    Awdawdawd
Integrations
No integrations available
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
jQuery
jQuery
Knockout
Knockout
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
HTML5
HTML5
Spring MVC
Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to React, jQWidgets?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase