StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. JUCE vs Qt

JUCE vs Qt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qt
Qt
Stacks464
Followers637
Votes138
JUCE
JUCE
Stacks39
Followers74
Votes10

JUCE vs Qt: What are the differences?

Welcome to the comparison between JUCE and Qt. In this analysis, we will explore the key differences between these two powerful frameworks.

  1. Cross-Platform Support: JUCE is primarily designed to be cross-platform, allowing developers to create applications that run on multiple operating systems seamlessly. On the other hand, Qt also offers cross-platform capabilities, but it goes a step further by providing additional support for embedded systems and mobile platforms, making it a more versatile choice.

  2. GUI Development: JUCE provides a complete toolkit for GUI development, offering a wide range of customizable UI components. While Qt also provides a rich set of UI components, it stands out with its QML (Qt Modeling Language) framework, which enables developers to design expressive and interactive UIs using a declarative syntax.

  3. Audio and DSP Capabilities: JUCE is renowned for its extensive audio and digital signal processing (DSP) functionalities, making it a popular choice for audio-centric applications such as music production software. Qt, on the other hand, offers some audio capabilities but is not as comprehensive as JUCE in this domain.

  4. Licensing Model: JUCE follows a dual licensing model, where it offers both a GPL license (free for open-source projects) and a commercial license (for commercial products). Qt employs a similar model with a selection of licenses, including LGPL (free for open-source projects) and commercial licenses, but it also offers an additional option of a LGPL exception license for proprietary software.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: JUCE has a smaller community compared to Qt, resulting in fewer available resources and examples. Qt, on the other hand, has a vast and active community, which leads to comprehensive documentation, extensive online resources, and vibrant developer forums, making it easier to find support and assistance.

  6. Integration with Existing Tools: JUCE provides a seamless integration with various industry-standard tools commonly used in audio and multimedia development, such as Pro Tools, VST, and AAX. Qt, on the other hand, is well integrated with IDEs like Qt Creator and Visual Studio, providing a streamlined development workflow.

In summary, JUCE excels in cross-platform audio and multimedia development, while Qt offers a broader range of cross-platform capabilities, extensive community support, advanced GUI development with QML, and integration with existing development tools. The choice between the two frameworks depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the project at hand.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qt
Qt
JUCE
JUCE

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

-
For desktop and mobile; Building powerful and complex applications; User Interface & Graphics; Audio & plug-ins.
Statistics
Stacks
464
Stacks
39
Followers
637
Followers
74
Votes
138
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 12
    Performance
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
Cons
  • 5
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 2
    Lack of community support
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
Pros
  • 4
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Fast
  • 1
    Nice GUI
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    Free Edition has Made with Juce
Integrations
No integrations available
Android OS
Android OS
React Native
React Native
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
iOS
iOS

What are some alternatives to Qt, JUCE?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase