StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Jumpsuit vs Marko

Jumpsuit vs Marko

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jumpsuit
Jumpsuit
Stacks3
Followers17
Votes1
Marko
Marko
Stacks29
Followers49
Votes40
GitHub Stars13.9K
Forks656

Jumpsuit vs Marko: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jumpsuit and Marko are two popular front-end frameworks that offer unique features and benefits for web development. Understanding the key differences between these two tools can help developers make informed decisions when choosing a framework for their projects.

  1. Architecture: Jumpsuit is based on Redux architecture, which provides a predictable state container for JavaScript apps. Marko, on the other hand, follows a more component-based architecture, focusing on building reusable and modular components to create dynamic web interfaces.

  2. Syntax: Jumpsuit uses JSX (JavaScript XML) syntax for defining component templates, making it more familiar to developers who have experience with React. Marko utilizes its own custom syntax, which is designed for efficient rendering and optimal performance, especially in server-side rendering scenarios.

  3. Tooling: Jumpsuit comes with built-in tooling for state management, including actions and reducers, which simplifies the process of managing application state. In comparison, Marko provides tools for incremental hydration, lazy loading, and server-side rendering to boost performance and optimize user experience.

  4. Ecosystem: Jumpsuit has a smaller ecosystem compared to Marko, which has a more robust community support, documentation, and third-party plugins. This larger ecosystem of Marko can be advantageous for developers seeking to leverage community resources and contributions for their projects.

  5. Server-side Rendering: Marko has strong support for server-side rendering out of the box, enabling developers to render components on the server before sending them to the client. Jumpsuit also supports server-side rendering but may require additional configurations and setup to achieve similar functionalities.

  6. Learning Curve: Jumpsuit may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its Redux-based architecture and JSX syntax. Marko, with its simplified and intuitive syntax, may be easier for beginners to grasp and start building projects quickly.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Jumpsuit and Marko in terms of architecture, syntax, tooling, ecosystem, server-side rendering, and learning curve can help developers determine the best fit for their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jumpsuit
Jumpsuit
Marko
Marko

A powerful and efficient Javascript framework that helps you build great apps. It is the fastest way to write scalable React/Redux with the least overhead.

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

-
Extremely fast; Streaming and async rendering; Progressive HTML rendering; Custom tags; Compiles to readable CommonJS modules; Server-side and client-side rendering; Use Marko with any web framework, including: Express, Koa, Hapi; Syntax highlighting in popular editors and IDEs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
656
Stacks
3
Stacks
29
Followers
17
Followers
49
Votes
1
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Less boilerplate
Pros
  • 6
    Simplicity
  • 5
    No JSX
  • 5
    Better than React, Vue, etc
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    HTML markup
Cons
  • 1
    Mobile native
  • 1
    Extensibility
  • 1
    Unit test
Integrations
React
React
Redux
Redux
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jumpsuit, Marko?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase