StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Kendo UI vs React

Kendo UI vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Kendo UI
Kendo UI
Stacks297
Followers359
Votes33
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks1.9K

Kendo UI vs React: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Kendo UI and React

Kendo UI and React are both popular JavaScript frameworks used for web development, but they have several key differences:

  1. Integration with Other Frameworks: Kendo UI is a comprehensive framework that can be easily integrated with other frameworks such as Angular, Vue, and jQuery. React, on the other hand, is a standalone library and can be used alongside other libraries or frameworks.

  2. Programming Paradigm: Kendo UI follows a more traditional approach to web development, utilizing a mix of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. React, on the other hand, is a component-based library that uses JavaScript to build reusable UI components.

  3. Rendering: Kendo UI primarily uses server-side rendering, where HTML is rendered on the server and sent to the client. React, on the other hand, uses client-side rendering, where HTML is generated dynamically on the client side.

  4. Performance: React is known for its fast rendering and efficient component updates. It uses a virtual DOM that allows it to minimize the number of actual updates to the real DOM. Kendo UI, on the other hand, relies on traditional DOM manipulation and may experience slower performance when dealing with complex UI structures.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: React has a large and vibrant community with a wide range of third-party libraries and tools available. It also has extensive documentation and support. Kendo UI also has a strong community, but it may be relatively smaller compared to React's community and therefore may have a slightly smaller ecosystem.

  6. Learning Curve: React has a steeper learning curve compared to Kendo UI. React introduces several concepts such as JSX, virtual DOM, and state management that may require some time to fully grasp. Kendo UI, on the other hand, follows more traditional web development practices that may be easier to understand for developers with experience in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

In summary, Kendo UI offers seamless integration with other frameworks, follows a more traditional programming paradigm, uses server-side rendering, may have slightly slower performance, has a strong but relatively smaller community, and has a relatively lower learning curve compared to React.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Kendo UI

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Kendo UI
Kendo UI

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
297
Followers
147.0K
Followers
359
Votes
4.1K
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 15
    Collection of controls
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Mobile
  • 4
    Multi-framework support
  • 2
    AngularJS
Cons
  • 4
    Massive footprint
  • 3
    Slow
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 1
    Poor customizability
  • 1
    Awdawd
Integrations
No integrations available
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to React, Kendo UI?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Preact

Preact

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase