StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Koa vs Total.js

Koa vs Total.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Koa
Koa
Stacks812
Followers483
Votes12
GitHub Stars35.7K
Forks3.2K
Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446

Koa vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe Koa as "Next generation web framework for node.js". Koa aims to be a smaller, more expressive, and more robust foundation for web applications and APIs. Through leveraging generators Koa allows you to ditch callbacks and greatly increase error-handling. Koa does not bundle any middleware. On the other hand, Total.js is detailed as "Framework for creating rich web sites, web applications, e-commerce and real-time applications". It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC.

Koa and Total.js can be categorized as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Some of the features offered by Koa are:

  • Provides 3 different kinds of functions as middleware
  • common function
  • async function

On the other hand, Total.js provides the following key features:

  • Super fast development
  • Extremely low maintenance costs
  • Rock solid stability

Koa and Total.js are both open source tools. Koa with 27.1K GitHub stars and 2.49K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Total.js with 3.97K GitHub stars and 434 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Koa
Koa
Total.js
Total.js

Koa aims to be a smaller, more expressive, and more robust foundation for web applications and APIs. Through leveraging generators Koa allows you to ditch callbacks and greatly increase error-handling. Koa does not bundle any middleware.

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

Provides 3 different kinds of functions as middleware; common function; async function; generator function
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
35.7K
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
GitHub Forks
446
Stacks
812
Stacks
20
Followers
483
Followers
62
Votes
12
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Async/Await
  • 5
    JavaScript
  • 1
    REST API
Pros
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 4
    Great support
  • 3
    UI components
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Developed as "one man show"
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
  • 2
    Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
  • 2
    Poor community
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry

What are some alternatives to Koa, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase