Lambdacult vs Laravel Vapor: What are the differences?

**Introduction**

**1. Pricing difference**: Lambdacult is generally more cost-effective for smaller projects, while Laravel Vapor is more suited for larger, high-traffic applications with varying pricing structures.

**2. Learning curve**: Lambdacult offers a more simplistic and easier-to-learn approach compared to Laravel Vapor, which requires a deeper understanding of AWS infrastructure and serverless technologies.

**3. Customization options**: Lambdacult provides limited customization features, making it ideal for developers who prefer a more straightforward setup, while Laravel Vapor offers extensive customization options for advanced users who want to tailor their serverless environment.

**4. Scalability**: Laravel Vapor supports auto-scaling out of the box, making it a preferred choice for projects that require rapid scalability based on traffic fluctuations, while Lambdacult may require manual adjustments for scaling.

**5. Integration with Laravel ecosystem**: Laravel Vapor seamlessly integrates with the Laravel framework, enabling developers to easily deploy and manage their applications, whereas Lambdacult may not offer the same level of integration with Laravel-specific features.

**6. Community support**: Laravel Vapor benefits from a larger community and active support forum compared to Lambdacult, which may result in quicker resolutions to issues and access to a broader range of resources for developers.

In Summary, Lambdacult and Laravel Vapor differ in pricing, learning curve, customization options, scalability, integration with Laravel ecosystem, and community support.