Leaf PHP vs LoopBack

Overview

LoopBack

Stacks285

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

Leaf PHP

Stacks4

Followers22

Votes20

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks70

Leaf PHP vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Architecture: Leaf PHP is a lightweight PHP micro-framework that follows a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while LoopBack is a highly extensible Node.js framework capable of building dynamic APIs with minimal coding.
Language: Leaf PHP uses PHP as its primary language for development, which is well-known for its simplicity and widespread usage in web development. In contrast, LoopBack is based on Node.js, utilizing JavaScript, offering event-driven and non-blocking I/O capabilities.
Database Connectivity: Leaf PHP provides support for various databases through the use of traditional SQL queries, allowing developers to work with MySQL, SQLite, and other SQL databases. On the other hand, LoopBack integrates with NoSQL databases like MongoDB by default, enabling developers to easily work with JSON-based documents.
Community Support: Leaf PHP community size and active contributors are relatively smaller compared to LoopBack, which has a larger and more vibrant community backing it up. This results in more extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available for LoopBack users.
User Authentication: Leaf PHP offers basic user authentication features that need to be implemented manually, whereas LoopBack provides built-in user management and authentication functionalities out of the box. This makes it easier for developers to secure their applications using LoopBack's authentication mechanisms.
Scalability: LoopBack is designed for building scalable applications by leveraging Node.js's asynchronous nature and event-driven architecture. In contrast, Leaf PHP may require additional configurations and optimizations to achieve the same scalability level as LoopBack.

In Summary, Leaf PHP and LoopBack differ significantly in terms of architecture, language, database connectivity, community support, user authentication, and scalability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack	Leaf PHP
A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.	It is a PHP micro-framework which helps you create web applications and APIs from the ground up in minutes. It gives you a particular structure to follow whiles maintaining PHP's freedom.
A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support	Quickly Create PHP Projects; Structured PHP; Simple PHP methods; Clean, Fast, Reliable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 70
Stacks 285	Stacks 4
Followers 556	Followers 22
Votes 33	Votes 20
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility	Pros 1 JWT Support 1 Easy to Learn 1 API's Load 5x Faster Than Bigger PHP Frameworks 1 MVC Support 1 Supports Migrations
Integrations
Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS StrongLoop GraphQL	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Leaf PHP?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Leaf PHP vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Architecture: Leaf PHP is a lightweight PHP micro-framework that follows a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while LoopBack is a highly extensible Node.js framework capable of building dynamic APIs with minimal coding.
Language: Leaf PHP uses PHP as its primary language for development, which is well-known for its simplicity and widespread usage in web development. In contrast, LoopBack is based on Node.js, utilizing JavaScript, offering event-driven and non-blocking I/O capabilities.
Database Connectivity: Leaf PHP provides support for various databases through the use of traditional SQL queries, allowing developers to work with MySQL, SQLite, and other SQL databases. On the other hand, LoopBack integrates with NoSQL databases like MongoDB by default, enabling developers to easily work with JSON-based documents.
Community Support: Leaf PHP community size and active contributors are relatively smaller compared to LoopBack, which has a larger and more vibrant community backing it up. This results in more extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available for LoopBack users.
User Authentication: Leaf PHP offers basic user authentication features that need to be implemented manually, whereas LoopBack provides built-in user management and authentication functionalities out of the box. This makes it easier for developers to secure their applications using LoopBack's authentication mechanisms.
Scalability: LoopBack is designed for building scalable applications by leveraging Node.js's asynchronous nature and event-driven architecture. In contrast, Leaf PHP may require additional configurations and optimizations to achieve the same scalability level as LoopBack.

In Summary, Leaf PHP and LoopBack differ significantly in terms of architecture, language, database connectivity, community support, user authentication, and scalability capabilities.

Leaf PHP vs LoopBack

Overview