Alternatives to LoadNinja logo

Alternatives to LoadNinja

Apache JMeter, Gatling, Locust, Loader.io, and AWS Device Farm are the most popular alternatives and competitors to LoadNinja.
6
19
+ 1
0

What is LoadNinja and what are its top alternatives?

It is 鈥痑 鈥痗loud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.
LoadNinja is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to LoadNinja

  • Apache JMeter

    Apache JMeter

    It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions. ...

  • Gatling

    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Locust

    Locust

    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. ...

  • Loader.io

    Loader.io

    Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections. ...

  • AWS Device Farm

    AWS Device Farm

    Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors. ...

  • k6

    k6

    It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It鈥檚 built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow. ...

  • BlazeMeter

    BlazeMeter

    Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br> ...

  • Flood IO

    Flood IO

    Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk. ...

LoadNinja alternatives & related posts

Apache JMeter logo

Apache JMeter

245
148
5
An open source load testing tool
245
148
+ 1
5
PROS OF APACHE JMETER
  • 3
    Requires no programming knowledge
  • 1
    Supports distributed
  • 1
    Open-source
CONS OF APACHE JMETER
  • 1
    It's GUI-first
  • 1
    Too complicated

related Apache JMeter posts

Gatling logo

Gatling

185
220
13
Open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty
185
220
+ 1
13
PROS OF GATLING
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 4
    Great detailed reports
  • 2
    Loadrunner
  • 2
    Scala based
  • 1
    Load test as code
CONS OF GATLING
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed

related Gatling posts

Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Locust logo

Locust

106
188
27
Define user behaviour with Python code, and swarm your system with millions of simultaneous users
106
188
+ 1
27
PROS OF LOCUST
  • 8
    Supports distributed
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    Easy to setup
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Hackable
  • 2
    Test Anything
CONS OF LOCUST
  • 1
    Bad design

related Locust posts

Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Loader.io logo

Loader.io

67
126
17
Simple Cloud-based Load Testing
67
126
+ 1
17
PROS OF LOADER.IO
  • 8
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Free tier
  • 3
    Heroku add-on
CONS OF LOADER.IO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Loader.io posts

    AWS Device Farm logo

    AWS Device Farm

    56
    125
    5
    Test your app on real devices in the AWS Cloud
    56
    125
    + 1
    5
    PROS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
    • 3
      1000 free minutes
    • 2
      Pay as you go pricing
    CONS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
    • 1
      Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done
    • 1
      You need to remember to turn airplane mode off

    related AWS Device Farm posts

    k6 logo

    k6

    52
    91
    43
    Developer centric open-source load and performance testing tool
    52
    91
    + 1
    43
    PROS OF K6
    • 10
      Fits nicely in a CI workflow
    • 10
      It's code-first
    • 9
      Open-source
    • 7
      Test scripts are written in javascript
    • 7
      Easy to use
    CONS OF K6
    • 2
      Requires bundling and transpiling to use npm packages

    related k6 posts

    BlazeMeter logo

    BlazeMeter

    49
    107
    12
    The Load Testing Platform for Developers
    49
    107
    + 1
    12
    PROS OF BLAZEMETER
    • 9
      I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
    • 3
      Easy to prepare JMeter workers
    CONS OF BLAZEMETER
    • 1
      UI centric

    related BlazeMeter posts

    Flood IO logo

    Flood IO

    12
    47
    5
    Where scalable software starts
    12
    47
    + 1
    5
    PROS OF FLOOD IO
    • 2
      Great feature set
    • 2
      Affordable
    • 1
      Easy to use
    CONS OF FLOOD IO
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Flood IO posts

      Vrashab Jian
      Shared insights
      on
      Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

      I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

      I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

      See more