Alternatives to Locust logo

Alternatives to Locust

Cicada Shell, Grasshopper, Gatling, k6, and Postman are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Locust.
173
51

What is Locust and what are its top alternatives?

Locust is an open-source load testing tool that allows developers to write test scenarios in Python code. With Locust, users can define user behavior through code, simulate thousands of users hitting a web application, and monitor performance metrics in real-time. However, one of the limitations of Locust is that it requires users to have a strong understanding of Python programming.

  1. JMeter: Apache JMeter is a popular open-source load testing tool that allows users to test the performance of web applications. Key features include multi-protocol support, easy-to-use GUI, and support for distributed testing. Pros of JMeter include a large user community and extensive documentation. Cons include a steep learning curve for beginners.
  2. Gatling: Gatling is an open-source load testing tool written in Scala. It offers features like code-based scenarios, high performance, and real-time metrics. Pros of Gatling include a user-friendly DSL for writing test scenarios and detailed reports. However, a limitation is its limited user community compared to other tools.
  3. k6: k6 is an open-source load testing tool that focuses on developer-centric performance testing. Key features include JavaScript scripting, CLI interface, and cloud-based load tests. Pros of k6 include easy integration with CI/CD pipelines and detailed metrics visualization. A potential con is the cost of using the cloud-based load test features.
  4. Artillery: Artillery is an open-source, modern load testing toolkit for web applications. It offers features like script-based testing, real-time metrics, and integrations with monitoring tools. Pros of Artillery include an active development community and the ability to run distributed tests. A limitation is the lack of a GUI for test configuration.
  5. Blazemeter: Blazemeter is a cloud-based load testing platform that offers features like scriptless test creation, robust reporting, and integration with popular development tools. Pros of Blazemeter include scalability for large tests and easy collaboration capabilities. A limitation is the cost of using the platform for large-scale testing.
  6. Loader.io: Loader.io is a cloud-based load testing platform that offers features like a simple interface, detailed reports, and flexible pricing options. Pros of Loader.io include easy setup for load tests and integration with popular developer tools. A limitation is the lack of advanced scripting capabilities compared to other tools.
  7. Flood: Flood is a cloud-based performance testing platform that offers features like scalable load tests, real-time reporting, and integrations with popular CI/CD tools. Pros of Flood include a user-friendly interface and support for various testing environments. A limitation is the pricing structure based on virtual users.
  8. LoadNinja: LoadNinja is a cloud-based load testing tool that offers features like scriptless test creation, real browser emulations, and detailed performance analytics. Pros of LoadNinja include user-friendly test creation and debugging capabilities. A limitation is the dependency on a stable internet connection for recording tests.
  9. RedLine13: RedLine13 is a cloud-based load testing platform that offers features like support for various testing tools, customizable test configurations, and cost-effective pricing options. Pros of RedLine13 include compatibility with popular load testing tools and detailed performance metrics. A limitation is the lack of advanced scripting capabilities compared to other platforms.
  10. Blitz: Blitz is a cloud-based load testing platform that offers features like easy test creation, real-time metrics, and integrations with popular developer tools. Pros of Blitz include a user-friendly interface and flexible pricing options. A limitation is the limited scalability for large tests compared to other platforms.

Top Alternatives to Locust

  • Cicada Shell
    Cicada Shell

    It is a simple bash-like Unix shell written in Rust.

  • Grasshopper
    Grasshopper

    Sound more professional and stay connected with Grasshopper, the Virtual Phone System designed for entrepreneurs. Grasshopper works just like a traditional phone system, but requires no hardware to purchase or software to install. ...

  • Gatling
    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • k6
    k6

    It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

  • Google Maps
    Google Maps

    Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow. ...

Locust alternatives & related posts

Cicada Shell logo

Cicada Shell

3
12
0
A Unix shell written in Rust
3
12
+ 1
0
PROS OF CICADA SHELL
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF CICADA SHELL
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Cicada Shell posts

      Grasshopper logo

      Grasshopper

      13
      23
      0
      The entrepreneur’s phone system
      13
      23
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF GRASSHOPPER
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF GRASSHOPPER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Grasshopper posts

          Gatling logo

          Gatling

          250
          319
          21
          Open-source load testing for DevOps and CI/CD
          250
          319
          + 1
          21
          PROS OF GATLING
          • 6
            Great detailed reports
          • 5
            Can run in cluster mode
          • 5
            Loadrunner
          • 3
            Scala based
          • 2
            Load test as code
          • 0
            Faster
          CONS OF GATLING
          • 2
            Steep Learning Curve
          • 1
            Hard to test non-supported protocols
          • 0
            Not distributed

          related Gatling posts

          Shared insights
          on
          LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

          I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

          See more
          Vrashab Jian
          Shared insights
          on
          Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

          I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

          I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

          See more
          k6 logo

          k6

          216
          226
          56
          Developer centric open-source load and performance testing tool
          216
          226
          + 1
          56
          PROS OF K6
          • 13
            Fits nicely in a CI workflow
          • 11
            Test scripts are written in javascript
          • 11
            It's code-first
          • 11
            Open-source
          • 10
            Easy to use
          CONS OF K6
          • 3
            Requires bundling and transpiling to use npm packages

          related k6 posts

          Shared insights
          on
          JavaScriptJavaScriptk6k6LocustLocust

          We're using Locust for load testing and k6. I came across k6 and I like JavaScript, please suggest which is better for API testing k6 or Locust?

          See more
          Postman logo

          Postman

          94.4K
          80.9K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          94.4K
          80.9K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.9M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Postman logo

          Postman

          94.4K
          80.9K
          1.8K
          Only complete API development environment
          94.4K
          80.9K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF POSTMAN
          • 490
            Easy to use
          • 369
            Great tool
          • 276
            Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
          • 156
            Easy setup, looks good
          • 144
            The best api workflow out there
          • 53
            It's the best
          • 53
            History feature
          • 44
            Adds real value to my workflow
          • 43
            Great interface that magically predicts your needs
          • 35
            The best in class app
          • 12
            Can save and share script
          • 10
            Fully featured without looking cluttered
          • 8
            Collections
          • 8
            Option to run scrips
          • 8
            Global/Environment Variables
          • 7
            Shareable Collections
          • 7
            Dead simple and useful. Excellent
          • 7
            Dark theme easy on the eyes
          • 6
            Awesome customer support
          • 6
            Great integration with newman
          • 5
            Documentation
          • 5
            Simple
          • 5
            The test script is useful
          • 4
            Saves responses
          • 4
            This has simplified my testing significantly
          • 4
            Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
          • 4
            Easy as pie
          • 3
            API-network
          • 3
            I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
          • 3
            Mocking API calls with predefined response
          • 2
            Now supports GraphQL
          • 2
            Postman Runner CI Integration
          • 2
            Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
          • 2
            Continuous integration using newman
          • 2
            Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
          • 2
            Runner
          • 2
            Graph
          • 1
            <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
          CONS OF POSTMAN
          • 10
            Stores credentials in HTTP
          • 9
            Bloated features and UI
          • 8
            Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
          • 7
            Poor GraphQL support
          • 5
            Expensive
          • 3
            Not free after 5 users
          • 3
            Can't prompt for per-request variables
          • 1
            Import swagger
          • 1
            Support websocket
          • 1
            Import curl

          related Postman posts

          Noah Zoschke
          Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.9M views

          We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

          Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

          Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

          This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

          Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

          Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

          Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

          Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

          • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
          • npm as package manager
          • NestJS as Node.js framework
          • TypeScript as programming language
          • ExpressJS as web server
          • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
          • Postman as a tool for API development
          • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
          • JSON Web Token for access token management

          The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

          • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
          • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
          • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
          • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
          See more
          Stack Overflow logo

          Stack Overflow

          69K
          60.9K
          893
          Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
          69K
          60.9K
          + 1
          893
          PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
          • 257
            Scary smart community
          • 206
            Knows all
          • 142
            Voting system
          • 134
            Good questions
          • 83
            Good SEO
          • 22
            Addictive
          • 14
            Tight focus
          • 10
            Share and gain knowledge
          • 7
            Useful
          • 3
            Fast loading
          • 2
            Gamification
          • 1
            Knows everyone
          • 1
            Experts share experience and answer questions
          • 1
            Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
          • 1
            Questions answered quickly
          • 1
            No annoying ads
          • 1
            No spam
          • 1
            Fast community response
          • 1
            Good moderators
          • 1
            Quick answers from users
          • 1
            Good answers
          • 1
            User reputation ranking
          • 1
            Efficient answers
          • 1
            Leading developer community
          CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
          • 3
            Not welcoming to newbies
          • 3
            Unfair downvoting
          • 3
            Unfriendly moderators
          • 3
            No opinion based questions
          • 3
            Mean users
          • 2
            Limited to types of questions it can accept

          related Stack Overflow posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more
          Google Maps logo

          Google Maps

          41.4K
          28.9K
          567
          Build highly customisable maps with your own content and imagery
          41.4K
          28.9K
          + 1
          567
          PROS OF GOOGLE MAPS
          • 253
            Free
          • 136
            Address input through maps api
          • 82
            Sharable Directions
          • 47
            Google Earth
          • 46
            Unique
          • 3
            Custom maps designing
          CONS OF GOOGLE MAPS
          • 4
            Google Attributions and logo
          • 1
            Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete

          related Google Maps posts

          Tom Klein

          Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

          See more

          A huge component of our product relies on gathering public data about locations of interest. Google Places API gives us that ability in the most efficient way. Since we are primarily going to be using as google data as a source of information for our MVP, we might as well start integrating the Google Places API in our system. We have worked with Google Maps in the past and we might take some inspiration from our previous projects onto this one.

          See more